Benchmarking the benchmarks
By Alan Earls
Benchmarks, like EPA mileage ratings, offer an appealing if, at times, flawed means of assessing the relative merit of competing products. Unlike EPA ratings, however, there are numerous different benchmarking standards and tests.
According to Arun Taneja, analyst with Enterprise Storage Group, Milford, Mass., individual switch companies generally use their own benchmarks to measure latency and other characteristics of the switch. The same is true of host bus adapters (HBAs).
However, Taneja says the industry benchmarks that dominate SANs are IOmeter and NetBench while for NAS the dominant benchmark has been SPECsfs from SPEC.org. "EMC and NetApp have fought battles on this for several years --unfortunately, SPEC found a serious bug in the benchmark recently and in mid-June put up a note on their web site that SPECsfs should not be used for NAS comparison until the bug is fixed," says Taneja. This doesn't necessarily mean that SPECsfs numbers are suspect because, Taneja suggests, it may simply have been a problem with accommodating new architectures like BlueArc.
"I think SPEC has the opportunity to take the lead in SANs just like they did in measuring system performance with SPECint and SPECfp," says Taneja. "They already have the organizational and technical infrastructure set up and have relationship with relevant vendor community," he adds.
Additionally, for an alternative view of benchmarks -- and some useful downloads -- visit http://www.raid-storage.com/benchmarks.html, a site provided by Advanced Computer & Network Corporation as an adjunct to their main focus (which is the design, manufacture and sale of RAID systems).
*Learn more about IOmeter in this searchStorage Administrator tip, "Testing I/O performance".
* We've had some interesting exchange of information on storage benchmarking in our Storage Management Tips and Tricks Discussion Forum. Check it out at http://searchstorage.discussions.techtarget.com/WebX?50@@.ee83ce3.
* And don't forget to send us your own tips! Submit your tip.
About the author: Alan Earls is a freelance writer in Franklin, MA.
Dig Deeper on Data storage strategy
The core of any networked storage infrastructure is the basic hardware components: storage arrays and the fabric that links them to client servers and other services. Over the past few years, the trend has been to networks built around director-class switches -- but how those directors are used is the key to whether they're just consolidation points to replace core-edge architectures or if they actually put more intelligence into the network.
Storage systems, too, have undergone considerable change. iSCSI storage arrays have steady increased their presence in data centers and remote locations, and as iSCSI technology and implementations mature, their impact is certain to become more profound. And on the leading edge of storage are systems that eschew or greatly reduce the role of spinning disks, replacing them with solid state devices that run cool, use far less power and take up less space. In this track, we'll look at the implications of these recent developments.