Storage magazine

Hypervisor vendors up the ante with new storage features


Evaluate Weigh the pros and cons of technologies, products and projects you are considering.

Users bullish on virtualizing storage and software-defined storage

Survey finds 89% of users virtualizing storage are "Very satisfied" or "Satisfied." Software-defined storage also heavily deployed.

A somewhat surprising 43% of survey respondents report they have virtualized at least some of their storage to pool those resources. And the results are a stunning success: 89% gave a "Very satisfied" or "Satisfied" thumbs up, 36% said they're wasting a lot less capacity and 47% have realized some new efficiencies. Storage virtualization methods vary, with decisions typically based on what kind of gear is already installed. Our respondents indicated a nearly even split among array-based storage virtualization, appliance-based and software installed on a server.

Software-defined storage (SDS), a much discussed "new" storage technology, is a close relative to storage virtualization—so close that it would be easy to view SDS as storage virtualization 2.0. Forty-six percent of those surveyed said their company has deployed software-defined storage, with another even split among the three chief methods: server software that accesses a connected JBOD or other storage device (21%), software that pools servers' direct-attached storage (22%), and software or hardware that pools shared storage systems so they look like one big storage array (22%). And these users are serious about their software-defined storage, with an average of 249 TB in capacity. Scalability and low cost are two of the most cited benefits of SDS, although some users noted a lack of traditional features like data deduplication (42%), thin provisioning (33%) and replication (31%). The top two reasons for not having implemented SDS yet: 38% are happy the way their current systems are running and 16% aren't sure what software-defined storage means.

Virtualizing resources to pool capacity

Virtualizing storage

Virtualized storage and efficient resource use

Pros of software-define storage implementation

Array features lacking on software-defined storage

Software-defined storage use

About the author:
Rich Castagna is editorial director of TechTarget's Storage Media Group.

Article 4 of 8
This was last published in June 2014

Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

Please create a username to comment.

Get More Storage magazine

Access to all of our back issues View All