News Stay informed about the latest enterprise technology news and product updates.

IBM starts showing its cloud arsenal

Hardly a day goes by without a new storage service rolling out. On Monday, it was IBM’s turn to launch two storage services as part of its portfolio of services for midsized customers – organizations with 100 to 400 employees and a handful of Windows servers.

The interesting thing about IBM’s Remote Data Protection Express and E-Mail Management Express offerings is they are the first new services IBM has launched from its Arsenal Digital Solutions acquisition in December. The Arsenal brand is gone but the remote data protection service is the same one that Arsenal offered, even still including data deduplication from EMC’s Avamar.

The email archiving service is something Arsenal was working on at the time of the acquisition, pushed to market quicker with IBM technology.

“Email management is a new offering [for Arsenal],” said Arsenal alum Brian Reagan, now an IBM Information Protection Services executive. “Under the covers we’ve started to adopt and integrate more IBM offerings.”

The email service covers Exchange and Lotus Notes, and Reagan said database and unstructured data archiving services are in the works.

Since Arsenal was into managed storage services long before anybody talked of clouds and SaaS (software as a service), I asked Reagan if he thought IBM should have kept the Arsenal brand. He said Arsenal did have a name for itself and partnerships with AT&T and other large providers, but IBM is a pretty recognizable name too.

“We get the benefit of IBM’s brand,” he said. “As Arsenal, we would have to spend twice as much money to get the attention of customers because they didn’t know who we were.” Reagan pointed out that IBM ran advertisements for its services during the PGA Masters broadcast. “That was something Arsenal could only dream of,” Reagan added.

Then again, you don’t have to be IBM to attract attention for storage services these days. Everybody’s getting into the cloud act, and Reagan says the glut of offerings have served mostly to confuse customers.

“There’s a tremendous amount of customer interest,” he said. “The downside is, it’s created confusion. Some of the really low end players that only service the consumer end of the market have clouded the picture. They’ve confused people wondering what the difference is between low end service that’s priced too good to be true and real resilient service.”

In other words, it will take awhile before enough sun shines on cloud computing so we can really know what to expect.

Join the conversation

11 comments

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

What's your biggest problem with VDI?
Cancel
Bringing together the right people - desktop, server, storage and network - and getting them to support the project has been the biggest challenge.
Cancel
It was a toss up between not saving money and complex licensing, both are major pains and contribute to me not taking the VDI route.
Cancel
I don't think VDI is worth the money. If you already have a good desktop management plan, it definitely won't
Cancel
Layering has really saved the day for us in terms of removing the hassles of app virt and letting us support the full range of use cases.
Cancel
MS licensing is the best thing to ever happen to open source software. Every time I have to think about MS licensing it gives me a headache. Linux is looking better all the time.
Cancel
VDI savings often assume the removal of traditional desktop costs. Unless you have simple one-desktop-fits-all requirements, VDI costs are likely to be in addition to your traditional desktop management costs. Add in to this the complexities of MS licensing and you almost certainly won't save money. But it doesn't have to only be about saving money, giving your people a flexible desktop with software they can access from anywhere may be worth the extra.
Cancel
Licensing is costly and managing VDI machines complex. Mostly I find that the 80% XenApp with App-V, 10% VDI and 10% Physical desktops works great for most typical setups.
Cancel
What is VDI?
Cancel
Selling Technology internally requires bottom line contribution.
Cancel
the licensing model is confusing very
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchDisasterRecovery

SearchDataBackup

SearchConvergedInfrastructure

Close