Why is the lack of a write ordering guarantee (i.e. the use of a track table as opposed to a side file, with the EMC SRDF -- async mode or adaptive copy solution) not mentioned more in the storage industry? I believe that I have read many storage documents that tout EMC's SRDF solution capabilities but very few that mention this.
While it would not be appropriate for me to attempt to represent the entire EMC marketplace, I will, nevertheless, take my best shot. (Far be it from me to do the appropriate thing.)
As far as I know, EMC has successfully side-stepped the issue by de-emphasizing their asynchronous capabilities, while emphasizing synchronous replication, along with their semi-synchronous replication. They also do a remarkably good job in managing what gets published about them.
I hope this is helpful. Thanks for writing.
Dig Deeper on Data storage management
Related Q&A from Evan Marcus
Storage expert Evan Marcus compares software and hardware RAID and outlines the benefits and drawbacks of each. Continue Reading
This expert answer explains the purpose of creating LUNs and details reasons for creating multiple LUNs. Continue Reading
This advice details the hardware and software requirements for setting up two data servers in fail-safe cluster mode for high availability. Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.