Will SATA and SAS SSDs likely continue to exist, filling different needs? Or is it more likely that one will overtake the other?
SAS is a more robust interface than SATA, with dual ports and end-to-end data integrity. SATA is a cheaper interface. SAS SSDs are gaining in popularity because of that robustness and a narrowing of the price differences.
But this is the storage market. In the storage market, no interface technology ever really dies. It was not that long ago when ATA was thought to be on its last legs, and then SATA appeared. There are still storage products utilizing bus and tag, a 60-year-old technology. The storage market is risk-averse. There is no winner take all.
Editor's note: To learn more about SAS and SATA SSD adoption and other enterprise storage trends, check out: Storage tiers: SAS interface, MLC flash rising.
Dig Deeper on All-flash arrays
Related Q&A from Marc Staimer
Network File System and Common Internet File System/Server Message Block were designed to work with any operating system, but NFS remains dominant in... Continue Reading
Object storage has unique features, including erasure coding and multi-copy mirroring, which may make it better suited to data protection than more ... Continue Reading
Why would you attach NAND flash storage directly to the memory channel? Isn't RAM much faster than NAND? Marc Staimer discusses this and more in this... Continue Reading