I am looking at two different
solutions: EMC's NS500 with a CX500 and HDS 9570 with clustered NetApp G270 filer heads. I would like to know your opinion about these solutions, as well anything I should take into account in regards to the NAS portion and performance. In your experience, have you seen a great performance variance between the NS500 and the gFiler? Will the processor and cache differences make a significant impact on performance?
I'm not sure that the NetApp FAS270 is offered as a separate gFiler. The smallest gFiler I believe is the GF920 (and GF920C for a fault tolerant version). There are performance differences and I recommend going to
and looking at the NFS benchmarks there. Every environment is slightly different, but that is an independent benchmark (not a lab that was paid to run a vendor specified test) which is a great place to start.
Performance is one thing to take into account. A few others are:
- Maximum capacity supported.
- Cache memory.
- Number of back-end (Fibre Channel) connections to disk.
- The types of disk arrays supported.
- Features, and how they work: Snapshot, remote copy and aggregated management.
There is a workbook on things to consider available for free on our Web site:
Dig Deeper on Primary storage devices
Compare SAN and NAS, and find out what to consider when using each storage system format. Object storage and the cloud are also affecting the storage...
Logical unit numbers are a logical abstraction between a physical disk device and applications. Learn more about LUN use cases and LUN security ...
What is the one hidden gotcha that you'd advise users about if they were shopping for an all-flash storage array?
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.