As data storage needs increase, network-attached storage users have to decide whether to stay with a scale-out...
NAS system or to convert to object storage. If the question of object storage vs. NAS had been raised even a couple of years ago, the response would have been something like this: "I'm used to NAS, but I just need scale. Object storage has a peculiar REST interface, which means app rewrites and, anyway, it's much slower. I'm staying with NAS."
Today, the answer has changed. NAS has extended to allow scale-out features and can potentially be built into petabyte installations. This overcomes capacity issues, but in the data integrity area, spreading file chunks over multiple appliances in the way that object storage does is still evolving.
Object storage has moved on from the days of being just a slow, archiving bulk storage method to join the fast and furious crew. Support for solid-state drives is now standard, and Ceph -- the de facto standard software for object storage systems -- has been retuned for speed, while vendors such as DDN offer fast options. The performance issue is going away, leading to fewer differences in the game of object storage vs. NAS.
Even the REST interface is giving way to a more comprehensive approach -- universal storage -- where the object store is front-ended to present as NAS with NFS and CIFS/SMB interfaces. This makes object storage a strong alternative to NAS, even where NAS is used for primary network storage.
If NAS is achieved by superimposing a local network file system on the object storage, the underlying files essentially become objects and can be deduplicated and compressed across the global file space. Given the sprawl seen in most NAS systems, this should be a major space saver with bonuses such as fast load times and much lower network traffic.
NAS vendors, of course, will respond to these features with similar functionality, but universal storage is inherently scalable and has years of stabilization. The object storage vs. NAS decision is becoming more difficult, and issues such as open source economics and vendor comfort will be significant factors. Caringo and Scality are strong players in the object space and may be a better match for some because of their support and depth of features.
The bottom line is that users need to be informed about object technology options before they can even contemplate the object storage vs. NAS issue. In the next half-decade, we can expect full convergence between NAS and object storage. Apart from the interface, they do very similar jobs, and the interface issue is being addressed.
Update scale-out NAS systems without hurting performance
Object stores enhance intelligence of scale-out systems
Object technology eases NAS file crawl issues with big data sets
Related Q&A from Jim O'Reilly
OpenStack Cinder has added a revert-to-snapshot function, enabling enterprises to recover from corrupted data sets. However, if the feature falls ... Continue Reading
Don't let backup data encryption fall through the cracks. When encrypting backups, key management and compression are just two of the best practices ... Continue Reading
While tape is notably offline and thus protected from cyberattacks, the cloud could comprehensively surpass it for backup if service providers figure... Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.