I found your comment interesting when you noted how a company could "avoid the software, to save cost..."In reality, wouldn't you agree the cost to maintain SAN documentation over the long run could be 3-5x the cost of what the software would initially cost $50k-$100k?
Management costs are usually in direct proportion to the size of the environment needing to be managed. That's why I included the following paragraph in my reply to the question you are speaking of: "Getting a good software package that will go out and scan the SAN for components and auto-document for you is almost a must have in very large SANs. Be aware though that there is no one perfect software solution available today. Each storage management application has something it does very well and other things that may need improvement." Let's put it in perspective. If you have smaller SAN, have skilled staff, document the heck out of it and keep your documentation up to date, you may be able to save money by doing all the management yourself. In larger SANs, without help from management tools, cost can add up quickly, mostly in the time and people costs spent in troubleshooting and provisioning.
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in one of our .bphAaR2qhqA^0@/searchstorage>discussion forums.
Dig Deeper on SAN technology and arrays
Related Q&A from Christopher Poelker
SAN expert Chris Poelker compares connecting a SAN with wavelength cabling and dark fiber and discusses the pros and cons of each. Continue Reading
SAN expert Chris Poelker discusses how to change the size of a LUN in a Microsoft cluster server environment. Continue Reading
Storage expert Chris Poelker outlines WWN basics in order to answer the question: "Why do HBAs in a SAN have same base?" Continue Reading