The downside to a wide RAID-5 set is that you can place more overhead on parity drives even though a rotating parity scheme is being used. This can impact drive rebuilds in a wide stripe, as performance is degraded using normal drive rebuilds and exasperated with many drives competing for parity resources. You want to strike a balance between having too few drives and too many. Confer with your vendor for their specific recommendations.
As to your question of the drive architecture's impact on RAID, there are two things to consider. One is the type of disk (single or dual processor), which can have an impact on performance; the other factor is the type of interface and how it is configured. SATA disk drives typically utilize single processors, while SCSI disks often have dual processors. Thus, for performance and I/O intensive environments, SCSI and Fibre Channel disks can provide better performance, while SATA is good for storage intensive storage applications.
Dig Deeper on Primary storage devices
Related Q&A from Greg Schulz
Service provider outages should be a warning to customers that keeping data safe in the cloud is a shared responsibility. Continue Reading
When cloud durability is added to the mix, cloud providers are able to tout a high number of nines of availability. Continue Reading
Cloud storage can be less expensive from a cost-per-gigabyte perspective, but it's important not to lose sight of other benefits as a value ... Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.