We are into consulting in Oracle application. Our main focus is into factory migration. We get client database averaging into 60G. We have SUN, HP and NT flavours. At any given point of time, 30 DBs are running.
Migration involves lots of IO as well as disk storage.
Hence we are unable to decide whether to go for NAS or SAN.
The issue you have in going to NAS for databases (especially with that many databases running), is that you may not be able to get the transaction performance you need compared to DAS or SAN solutions. You need to understand what the performance requirements are. I suspect that they are very high and you will want to stay with SAN.
There are some significant performance enhancements being made with NAS that may change that decision in the near future. Keep your eyes open for the DAFS announcement that is coming and the performance numbers. This may change the decision in the future.
As with any performance question, you need to know your requirements and the capabilities of the technologies.
Evaluator Group, Inc.
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in our Storage Networking discussion forum.
Dig Deeper on Database storage
Related Q&A from Randy Kerns
What is the one hidden gotcha that you'd advise users about if they were shopping for an all-flash storage array? Continue Reading
How much control do you have with all-flash storage arrays? How much control do you have over how arrays handle your data? Do you control the caching? Continue Reading
Vendors often publish numbers for 'usable' capacity versus 'effective' capacity. Can you explain this and how can you plan flash capacity needs with ... Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.