I guess it's all in the semantics.
Network Appliance has industry recognition as a NAS vendor providing shared storage pools accessed over IP connections. The other vendors you mention may also have NAS solutions but are recognized as providing Fibre Channel based solutions using block based storage arrays (SCSI over Fibre). Either may be considered as part of a "storage network" but SAN generally refers to block based access and NAS generally refers to file based access. (That's why they are called "filers.")
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in our Storage Networking discussion forum.
Dig Deeper on Primary storage devices
Related Q&A from Christopher Poelker
SAN expert Chris Poelker discusses how to change the size of a LUN in a Microsoft cluster server environment. Continue Reading
SAN expert Chris Poelker compares connecting a SAN with wavelength cabling and dark fiber and discusses the pros and cons of each. Continue Reading
Storage expert Chris Poelker outlines WWN basics in order to answer the question: "Why do HBAs in a SAN have same base?" Continue Reading