The performance of 3-D NAND compared to 2-D NAND is noticeably faster on both IOPS and throughput . A big chunk...
of that increase comes from the parallelism of so many chips packed densely together. The performance promise of 3-D NAND is up to 10 times that of 2-D NAND. It's not there yet, but it's getting there.
Performance tests and ratings from the manufacturers demonstrate noticeably faster write times than equivalent 2-D NAND, higher throughput, as well as IOPS. None of the differences move the needle dramatically… yet. But they are noticeably better at a competitive -- albeit higher -- price.
The longevity is where 3-D NAND shines over 2-D NAND. The advantage is considerable, easily beating 2-D NAND wear-life by a minimum of 2X. One of the primary reasons is that 3-D NAND is based on much larger die sizes (40 nm vs. 10 to 19 nm.) That means there is a much lower bit error rate (BER) per KB of data.
That reduced BER decreases the robustness required of the error-correcting code. The larger die size also means lower voltage is required to read the state of any given cell increasing the PE cycles or wear-life considerably. Wear-life increases so much more in fact, that Samsung is providing a 10-year warranty on their V-NAND 3-D NAND solid-state drives (SSDs).
A closer look at 3-D NAND cost, capacity
How does 3-D NAND flash work?
What is the future of NAND flash?
Dig Deeper on Solid-state storage
Related Q&A from Marc Staimer
Network File System and Common Internet File System/Server Message Block were designed to work with any operating system, but NFS remains dominant in... Continue Reading
Object storage has unique features, including erasure coding and multi-copy mirroring, which may make it better suited to data protection than more ... Continue Reading
Why would you attach NAND flash storage directly to the memory channel? Isn't RAM much faster than NAND? Marc Staimer discusses this and more in this... Continue Reading