In response to one of your earlier Q&As, you mentioned that ATM was being promoted by storage providers for SAN-WAN applications.
However, all the work is going on in the area of FCIP and iFCP. Is anyone leading FC-ATM inter-working efforts? Is there a reason why no one is promoting that?
There is no need to lead an effort to use ATM as a connection between SAN islands. It's already being done. It works, and as far as I know, it has been working since I did my first one back in 1998.
Using ATM has advantages since you can provide for QOS on the connection between storage devices using the ATM network for data replication. The QOS is useful for making sure enough bandwidth is available during peak processing times.
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in one of our .bphAaR2qhqA^0@/searchstorage>discussion forums.
Dig Deeper on SAN technology and arrays
Related Q&A from Christopher Poelker
SAN expert Chris Poelker compares connecting a SAN with wavelength cabling and dark fiber and discusses the pros and cons of each. Continue Reading
SAN expert Chris Poelker discusses how to change the size of a LUN in a Microsoft cluster server environment. Continue Reading
Storage expert Chris Poelker outlines WWN basics in order to answer the question: "Why do HBAs in a SAN have same base?" Continue Reading