Which is better and what are the advantages and disadvantages of each? I know ATA is a lot cheaper, so do I install an ATA RAID array (for users files) or do I stick with (like everybody else) good old SCSI RAID array?
The drive mechanisms are EXACTLY the same between ATA and SCSI drives except for the high-speed 10,000 and 15,000RPM drives, which run very hot. There is virtually no reliability advantage to SCSI Performance can be better with SCSI due to tagged command queuing (TCQ). However, Windows is not exactly optimized for great I/O performance, which means that TCQ might not buy you anything. Also TCQ really comes through under heavy workloads and is best for high-end transaction processing. An array of 7200RPM ATA drives should perform very well. Use RAID1 or 0+1 for best performance.
I'd say it's safe to save a little money and go to ATA drives for user files. Do you need hot swapping? If so, make sure you can get it in the subsystem you buy -- that's not a function of the drive but the RAID controller and the bus electronics.
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in one of our .bphAaR2qhqA^0@/searchstorage>discussion forums.