Tip

The five pieces of a storage management pie

The five pieces of a storage management pie
By Michele Hope, Site Editor

Enterprise Storage Group Senior Analyst Steve Duplessie came on SearchStorage to share his company's five-part framework about what storage management really means. Among other things, he said that he believed you must have all five of the following elements for a robust enterprise storage management model:

  • Storage resource management
  • Virtualization
  • Data management
  • Storage network management
  • Policy engine

Do you know what's involved with each of these components and where your organization's storage management tools and methods fit into this model? If not, you might want to take a few minutes checking the slides associated with this session.

Judging by the good response from our readers, Duplessie hit a nerve with this topic as well. There were a number of questions posed by our audience. He took the time out to answer these in our Storage Management discussion forum. We've provided some highlights from his answers below.

Duplessie

    Requires Free Membership to View

--> --> --> .ty1raYZMbRD^1@.ee83ce3/122!viewtype=threadDate&skip=&expand=>told one attendee that you are likely to see SRM tools coming from independent software vendors (ISVs) today, as opposed to hardware vendors, although he did mention that Sun (HighGround) and HP -- "who has something coming" -- were notable exceptions to this rule. "We prefer ISVs," he said, "As they have no ties, but as long as the software supports lots of hardware, and operating systems, (as it is with HighGround), you'll be okay."

Who did he think were the vendors with the best vision and position to such a comprehensive view of storage management in future? It's EMC, according to Duplessie. "EMC really is the king technology-wise right now," he said. "They have the best overall integrated architecture, and their stuff does what we want it to do. Traditionally it hasn't been talked about much, because it has been Symm-centric exclusively. EMC is making noise about really becoming an open systems software company, and so far they are living up to that mantra. Assuming they stay the course, they will be tough to beat. They own the market; they have the technology and tools; and their sales and support abilities are exceptional. We think everyone should be joining their E-Infostructure program (yes, even competitors) and latching on for the ride."

Although Duplessie noted EMC is winning in the race to a comprehensive storage management model, he cautions not to disregard some of the other heavy contenders, including Veritas, BMC and a number of good SRM and backup players. "You can't count out Veritas -- who owns data management and, to a degree, virtualization," he said.

About the author: Michele Hope is the site editor for searchStorage.com She can be reached for comment at mhope@techtarget.com.

Additional resources:


This was first published in November 2001

There are Comments. Add yours.

 
TIP: Want to include a code block in your comment? Use <pre> or <code> tags around the desired text. Ex: <code>insert code</code>

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
Sort by: OldestNewest

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

Disclaimer: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.