Tip

Managing data migration among storage tiers

What you will learn from this tip: Rick Cook outlines a number of approaches to tiered data migration.

As storage becomes more sophisticated, and information lifecycle management

Requires Free Membership to View

(ILM) becomes a fact of life for more enterprises, the data migration among storage tiers becomes more complex.

Tiered storage information

Five tips in five minutes: Tiered storage and ILM

ILM, ISI keys to real-time data warehousing

Migrate old files to curb disk costs

Ultimately, at least some of the data will be migrated to tape, magneto-optical (MO) or some other form of archival storage, a function normally handled by the backup software. However, before then, larger amounts of data may need to be shifted three or four times to progressively cheaper storage.

One goal in all of this is migrating data with minimum disruption. Ideally, the applications using the data should require either minimal or no changes as the data is migrated until, perhaps, it is finally archived. However, this isn't easy, especially if you want to do it automatically in response to established business rules.

There are a number of approaches to the process of tiered migration, depending on budgets and specific needs.

A number of storage management systems, including Hewlett-Parckard Co.'s StorageWorks, offer file migration agents -- either built-in or as add-ons -- that are designed to work closely with the main management application.

For many vendors, tiered migration is part of storage virtualization. Companies such as EMC Corp., (which bought Rainfinity) and Neopath Networks Inc., offer NAS virtualization front ends which can shuffle data between storage devices, and hence storage tiers, automatically. Ideally, the process is invisible to users and applications alike. Likewise, companies like Incipient Inc., offer migration as part of their virtualization offerings for storage area networks (SAN). Incipient's NSP software runs on the SAN switches to handle moving data.

A potentially cheaper approach, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises, is to keep the data on the same storage array, but shift it among RAID levels. Something like RAID-5 requires less redundancy, and hence makes cheaper storage, than RAID-10, which requires 2 megabytes (MB) of storage capacity for each MB of data. This saves the expense of additional storage devices, but usually means that the system can't take advantage of lower-cost technologies such as SATA.

Do you know…

The answers to the data migration challenge?

About the author: Rick Cook has been writing about mass storage since the days when the term meant an 80 K floppy disk. The computers he learned on used ferrite cores and magnetic drums. For the last 20 years, he has been a freelance writer specializing in storage and other computer issues.


This was first published in August 2006

There are Comments. Add yours.

 
TIP: Want to include a code block in your comment? Use <pre> or <code> tags around the desired text. Ex: <code>insert code</code>

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
Sort by: OldestNewest

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

Disclaimer: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.