What are the differences between differential and incremental backups? This is a question that continues to generate many debates based on terminology. Maybe the best place to start is by defining the terms and looking at some of the pros and cons of each type.
- • Differential Backup
- A differential backup will back up all files that have changed since the last full
The big advantage to this method comes when performing a complete restore since only the full and latest differential backups need to be restored. The downside is that the size of the differential backup will grow throughout the week and become progressively larger until the next full. This can adversely affect backup windows.
- • Incremental Backup
- An incremental backup will back up all files that have changed since the last backup, regardless of whether it was a full or incremental backup. In other words, if a full backup was done on Monday, Tuesday's incremental will back up all changed files since Monday's backup. However, Wednesday's incremental will only back up files that have changed since Tuesday's incremental backup.
The main advantage to this method is that a lot fewer files are backed up daily between full backups allowing for shorter backup windows. The disadvantage is that when performing a complete restore, the latest full and all subsequent incremental backups must be restored, which can take significantly longer.
Both full and incremental backups reset the archive bit on a file (indicating it has been backed up) and a differential backup does not. This is obviously a simplified explanation, but the resetting of the archive bit is the definitive difference between incremental and differential backups.
To complicate matters however, some software vendors felt this terminology was not adequate and decided to take a different approach. To some, any backup that does not arbitrarily backup all files (like a full backup) is considered an incremental backup. There are then cumulative incremental backups (called differential backups by most people) and there are differential incremental backups (simply called incremental by most people).
Unfortunately, this introduces a contradictory use of the term differential, which is at the source of many discussions about what the proper terminology should be. That said, regardless of which terminology you prefer, what is important to understand is that a full backup will cover all files and subsequent backups between full backups can either reference the last full or the last partial backup.
When attempting to determine which of these technologies is best suited for a specific environment, the differences described above become secondary. With today's high-performance hardware, data explosion and compliance issues, the focus has shifted to deciding between tape and disk backup or data replication rather than between full, differential and incremental backups.
For more information:
About the author: Pierre Dorion is a business continuity consultant with Mainland Information Systems Inc. in Phoenix, Ariz., specializing in business continuity planning, backup and recovery and data availability as well as IT processes development.
This was first published in May 2005