FCIP v. iFCP

Tells what these protocols are used for, and why you're interested in them.

 

FCIP v. iFCP
Tom Clark

With all the acronyms that are floating around the storage world these days, you have to wonder who thought up all that alphabet soup. But then you have to wonder if these acronyms are, or ever will be, important to you as a storage pro, and further, whether the technologies they represent will be around for longer than the extent of a marketer's imagination.

Good question, and one that was addressed in our recently held online event on IP storage fundamentals. The guest speaker was Tom Clark, director of technical marketing for Nishan Systems.

And what was the specific question? "Is there room for both FCIP (Fibre Channel over IP) and iFCP (Internet Fibre Channel protocol)?"

And the answer.

Certainly. FCIP and iFCP fulfill two very different functions. FCIP simply extends existing Fibre Channel fabrics. For FCIP, TCP/IP is only used to traverse a metro or wide area distance. I call this a Fibre Channel perpetuation strategy, since FCIP assumes that aside from the tunnel itself, everything else will be (and remain) Fibre Channel.

iFCP, by contrast, is a migration strategy from current Fibre Channel SANs to future IP SANs. iFCP gateways can either complement existing Fibre Channel fabrics, or replace them altogether, while still leveraging the considerable investment customers have made in Fibre Channel storage. Since iFCP enables customers to build IP SAN fabrics, it also conveniences migration to mixed Fibre Channel/iSCSI environments. FCIP will continue to be used by customers who are comfortable with and have the expertise to support Fibre Channel fabric configurations. iFCP will be used by customers who want to minimize the Fibre Channel fabric component and maximize use of their TCP/IP infrastructure. I think both protocols will be used for some time to come, although iFCP solves some fundamental problems of Fibre Channel extension that FCIP cannot.


This was first published in January 2002

Dig Deeper on NAS management

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

0 comments

Oldest 

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchSolidStateStorage

  • Tintri VMstore T5000

    Like all of its VM-aware storage systems, Tintri’s first all-flash array -- the Tintri VMstore T5000 -- allows admins to bypass ...

  • SolidFire SF9605

    The high-capacity SolidFire SF9605 uses SolidFire’s Element OS 8 (Oxygen) to deliver new enterprise features such as synchronous ...

  • HPE 3PAR StoreServ 20850

    HPE 3PAR StoreServ 20850 holds 1,024 solid-state drives (SSDs). Hewlett Packard Enterprise claims it can deliver more than three ...

SearchVirtualStorage

SearchCloudStorage

SearchDisasterRecovery

SearchDataBackup

  • Asigra Cloud Backup Version 13

    Asigra Cloud Backup Version 13 provides an AWS Elastic Block Store Snapshot Manager and the ability to support Docker container ...

  • Veeam Availability Suite v8

    Veeam Availability Suite v8 offers several key backup software components in one package, including Veeam Cloud Connect, Snapshot...

  • Druva inSync 5.5

    Druva inSync 5.5 endpoint backup software stands out with its proactive compliance, cloud app integration, full text search and ...

Close