Home > Storage Technology Tips > Data storage management > Fail-in-place systems: Avoiding hard disk drive failures
Storage Tips:
EMAIL THIS
 TIPS & NEWSLETTERS TOPICS 

Fail-in-place systems: Avoiding hard disk drive failures


Marc Staimer
Rating: -4.60- (out of 5)

Fail-in-place is a fairly new concept aimed at resolving some of the side effects of hot-plug or hot-swap hard disk drives (HDDs) in storage systems. Examples of these difficult side effects include pulling the wrong drive and causing inadvertent data loss; delaying the replacement of a failed HDD, which defers rebuild starts and increases data loss risk; or using spare drives that may not have been recently tested, which may result in a second hard disk drive failure.

The basic concept of fail-in-place is to redefine and increase the smallest field-replaceable unit (FRU) from being a HDD to being a storage pack. A storage pack is a collection of hard disk drives operating in concert with a certain percentage of capacity allocated for sparing. Hard disk drive failures are automatically rebuilt from the a...


BROWSE BY TAG
Data storage management,   Primary Storage or Storage Hardware,   Disk drives,   Storage Strategy,   Enterprise storage, planning and management,   VIEW ALL TAGS

RELATED CONTENT
Data storage management
Cloud storage pricing: The cost of a hypothetical month of cloud data storage
Cloud storage pricing revealed: Hidden costs include data migration and access fees
Creating a data center migration plan
Top 10 enterprise data storage tips of 2009
Building a private storage cloud: Essential components
How to add solid-state storage to your enterprise data storage systems
Is cloud data storage right for your IT infrastructure?
Optimizing enterprise data storage capacity and performance to reduce your data footprint
Is data deduplication right for your primary storage infrastructure?
Data storage resources needed to implement a virtual desktop infrastructure

Disk drives
SAS drives showing up more and more
Disks and disk subsystems finalists: 2009 Products of the Year
SAS challenges Fibre Channel drives
Primary storage data reduction advancing via data deduplication, compression
NetApp: Post-process deduplication limits performance hit in primary storage data deduplication
EMC Celerra: Primary storage data reduction through deduplication, compression
Storwize claims good data compression rates, no performance degradation on STN-6000 appliance
Primary storage data reduction: Data deduplication and compression tools
Gartner analyst on data deduplication for primary storage
Ocarina ECOsystem deconstructs before compression, deduplication for primary storage data reduction
Disk drives Research

Enterprise storage, planning and management
Trend or just trendy?
Building a private storage cloud: Essential components
Performance metrics: Evaluating your data storage efficiency
Riverbed offers peek at WAFS for cloud storage with virtual Steelhead appliance
Enterprise data storage technologies rise from the dead
Optimizing enterprise data storage capacity and performance to reduce your data footprint
Storage redux: Purchase plans reviving
How to select a storage resource management (SRM) tool
Data archiving: Three key elements
Common places for data storage bottlenecks in your IT infrastructure

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
backup robot  (SearchStorage.com)
DASD  (SearchStorage.com)
disk-to-disk-to-tape  (SearchStorage.com)
Fibre Channel  (SearchStorage.com)
hard-drive encryption  (.com)
holographic disk drive  (SearchStorage.com)
hybrid hard drive  (SearchStorage.com)
Robson  (SearchStorage.com)
Serial ATA  (SearchStorage.com)
solid-state drive  (SearchStorage.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary


llocated capacity. There are currently only two vendors supplying fail-in-place storage systems: Atrato Inc. (with its Velocity1000 or V1000) and Xiotech Corp. (with the Emprise 5000 or ISE). Both systems feature end-to-end error detection and correction, as well as autonomic self-healing.

Both vendors' product architectures are based on the concept of available user capacity being tightly coupled with enclosure lifecycle within a single FRU. An enclosure's lifecycle is the timeframe in which the enclosed raw capacity will be available to an application. The total enclosure capacity also includes an allowance for anticipated sparing requirements over the warranted capacity life of the enclosure (three years for Atrato and five years for Xiotech).

Atrato V1000 vs. Xiotech Emprise 5000 or ISE

The differences between the two implementations are reflective of each vendor's product philosophies. Atrato makes 2.5-inch SATA drives enterprise-capable with their ORT, end-to-end error correction and detection, autonomic self-healing, high densities per enclosure, and with clever vibration and cooling methods. They improve performance by combining 160 drives for up to 80 TB in a 3U enclosure that provides up to 12,500 IOPS and 1.5 GBps throughput from a single enclosure.

Xiotech's focus is on providing increased reliability and performance from enterprise Fibre Channel and SAS 3.5-inch and 2.5-inch drives. The baseline FRU is a sealed DataPac of 10 3.5-inch or 20 2.5-inch Fibre Channel or SAS HDDs for up to 16 TB in 3U. Each ISE has dual removable DataPacs, power supplies with cooling, 96-hour battery backup and active-active RAID controllers.

Unlike standard storage subsystems, ISE DataPacs feature innovations such as sophisticated vibration reduction and improved cooling; Xiotech exploits the internal structure of all of the components to fully leverage very advanced drive and system telemetry. DataPac drives feature special firmware that relieves the burden of device compatibility required of all other storage subsystems. The result of the tightly knit control within the DataPac is a highly reliable "super disk" that has demonstrated more than a 100-fold increase in reliability vs. a typical storage system drive bay (based on Xiotech's test of 208 ISEs containing 5,900 drives for 15 months with no service events).

Atrato and Xiotech have proven that fail-in-place works. Their product testing indicates these technologies can virtually eliminate HDD replacement service calls, which translates into lower costs, less risk of lost data and fewer application disruptions.

Rate this Tip
To rate tips, you must be a member of SearchStorage.com.
Register now to start rating these tips. Log in if you are already a member.




DISCLAIMER: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.



Find Data Backup Analysis
TechTarget Storage Media
Storage Magazine View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
Storage Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
SearchStorage.com
HomeNewsMagazineTopicsLearningMultimediaWhite PapersBlogsEventsAbout Us

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2000 - 2010, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts