| Home > Storage Technology News > Complex storage infrastructure root of management woes | |
| Storage Technology News: |
|
||
Last year, we were hearing that simplified storage management was the key to improved storage utilization. Now, you're saying the focus should be on improving the storage infrastructure. What brought this change about? What strategies are on IBM's storage agenda this year? We're focusing on storage infrastructure software. Tivoli focuses on storage management. We need both. If you think about an automobile in the 1930's, it was this clunkety thing, and we said, we need better management tools. Let's put lots of dials on the dashboard like a tachometer. We could also say, why don't we build an automatic transmission? Let's go change the infrastructure so it's easier. We're in the automatic transmission business. Tivoli is in the management business.
What are some of the top concerns you hope to address for storage managers? What IBM products will be included in this new product line? It's really three pieces: Virtualization, common file systems (SAN-based file systems) and standards-based management. We're building a virtualization engine for blocks, and Storage Tank, which provides a SAN-wide file system. We're doing all this in the context of industry-standards-based management and doing it in such a way that our storage managers, Tivoli or somebody else can manage the automation products we're building. If we've done our job right, we won't know who is managing our products.
What benefits will users see in the early product releases? The first release of the virtualization engine offers the basic virtualization ability, flash copy and remote copy, migration services and ability to import data. From that we'll move into more advanced disaster recovery services and hierarchical storage management. Storage Tank will allow people to consolidate what's in some cases thousands of file servers. I think of it sometimes as NAS for the enterprise. Network attached storage does that. It lets a whole bunch of servers access the file system, provides heterogeneous file support, file sharing, but it doesn't play very well in the enterprise where you need high performance. It starts out in the early release supporting Sun, Solaris, HP/UX, AIX, Linux and NT so all of those systems can share a common file system complete with N+1 failover. We will add to that 390 connectivity in a future release. It's a way to provide the single file system, common naming system, heterogeneous file sharing, but to do all of that with local file system performance. Storage Tank will be a very complete solution when we deliver it because it's been in development since 1999.
How will industry standards play a role in the adoption of these technologies? The other good news is that all of these standards for interoperability that have come out of SNIA are actually, I think, very, very well done. And they're all based in XML. So, it's very simple. With a focus on interoperability, vendors are pretty much looking forward to CIM standards. I think in a year, they'll be here. It amazes me that some vendors still try to argue that it's a few years away -- it just isn't. It's going to happen. FOR MORE INFORMATION IBM makes good on virtual shark IBM's Sanford sees storage nirvana IBM wraps NAS in self healing server software
'); // -->
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||