Home > Storage Technology News > 4 Gb/s FC: Why Bother?
Storage Technology News:
EMAIL THIS

4 Gb/s FC: Why Bother?

By Jo Maitland, News Director
08 Apr 2004 | SearchStorage.com

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   

PHOENIX -- "To heck with 4 Gig Fibre Channel, we'll wait for 10 Gig," says Lynn Neal, senior systems integrator at Sprint. And it seems she's not the only one.

End users here at Storage Networking World are very clear about their feelings on 4 Gb/s Fibre Channel networks: They don't need them. At least not for the foreseeable future anyway.

"We're not even utilizing 2 Gig today and we have a petabyte of storage and 2,000 SAN switch ports," Lynn boasts.

Rick Faszold, technical services manager at St Anthony's Medical Center, a mid-size metropolitan hospital in St. Louis, Missouri, says he's not interested in 4 Gb/s either as there are no applications that can take advantage of it yet. "Maybe when nurses are running around with tablet computers and all clinical documentation is online it might be necessary," he says.

Still, the vendors are throwing it out there as demos from Seagate, Emulex and Xyratech at the show prove. The craze for 4 Gb/s FC was actually started by the drive manufacturers who decided that 10 Gb/s speeds didn't make sense all the way to the drive.

Regardless of performance capabilities, the switch vendors say there will be a cost incentive that will make it an inevitable purchase. "The economic incentive to switch to 4 Gig will be like the move from 1 to 2 Gig…If a 4 Gig port costs the same or a bit more than 2 Gig it's a no-brainer," says Patrick Harr, VP of director platforms at McData. The company says it will offer 4 Gb/s FC support on its Sphereon in the first quarter of 2005.

What about integration with 2 Gb/s switches? Will storage managers have to go through the same nightmare swapping to 4 Gb/s Fibre Channel as they did to 2 Gb/s?

"Theoretically, it should be slightly easier," explains Derek Granath, director of product management at Brocade as there's backwards compatibility from 2 to 4 Gb/s FC which there wasn't between 1 and 2. He says from1 to 2 gigabit FC customers had to cut the cable on the switch and use a dongle to attach to the newly designed 2 Gig FC GBIC (Gigabit Interface Connector). Thankfully, 4 Gig uses the same form factor interfaces as 2 Gig so it should simply be a case of plugging the new cable directly into the switch.

Conversely, upgrading to 10 Gb/s Fibre Channel will be extremely expensive and disruptive as it requires entirely new connectors and different coding. For this reason vendors think 4 Gb/s Fibre Channel might end up getting a longer play than people think.

Unless of course, customers decide to ditch Fibre Channel altogether and buy 10 Gb/s Ethernet. Scotty Logan, senior architect of technology strategy and support at Stanford University thinks this isn't out of the question. "Putting in 10 Gig Ethernet with RDMA will be just as disruptive as 10 Gig Fibre Channel, it's clearly an opportunity to change," he says.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

All aboard the 4 Gb Fibre Channel bandwagon

SD2003: 10 Gb Emergence in the data center



Tags: ProductHardwareNetwork Attached Storage (NAS)Advanced TechnologiesEnterprise Storage PlanningNewsVIEW ALL TAGS

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   



RELATED CONTENT
Product
EMC overhauls ControlCenter
Department of Homeland Security automates storage
ISCSI brings VMware to a new audience
IBM adds more FC, DAS products; dithers on iSCSI
Users: Onaro SAN management tool could do more
EMC plays catch-up with Clariion
Revamped Cisco WAFS worth the wait, users say
Exchange 2007 storage enhancements: Cure-all or Band-Aid?
Storage Clips: Vicom introduces data migration service
NetApp launches $5K box for small businesses

Hardware
StorageTek lauds EMC-ADIC deal
Xyratex swims in public pool
MTI loses money, expands
Industry debates the role of SATA drives
HDS soups up SATA
Reuters switches 15,000 servers from IBM to HP
Storage basics: The tale of tape
Brocade outlines market plans
EMC to tout integration, ILM progress
Intel eyeing storage white boxes?

Network Attached Storage (NAS)
ISCSI wows some users, confuses others
NAS clustering breaks 1 GB barrier
Sun recharges its storage line
Iomega debuts NAS cube
Microsoft lines up NAS partners
EMC offers Windows-based NAS, for how much?
HP storage: What went wrong?
Moving Exchange 2000 database to NetApp filers
Sun and NAS to meet again
Storage Decisions 2004 special report

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary



Backup Solution Directory
TechTarget Storage Media
Storage Magazine View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
Storage Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
SearchStorage.com
HomeNewsMagazineTopicsLearningMultimediaWhite PapersBlogsEventsAbout Us

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2000 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts