IBM denies layoffs result of deal with Hitachi

Article

IBM denies layoffs result of deal with Hitachi

Recent jobs cuts in its storage division raised more than a few eyebrows. But, while IBM insists the layoffs were determined long before the deal with Hitachi was finalized, at least one expert questions whether Big Blue's streamlining efforts says more about its storage strategy than Big Blue is letting on.

FOR MORE INFORMATION

    Requires Free Membership to View

    When you register for SearchStorage.com, you’ll also receive targeted emails from my team of award-winning editorial writers. Our goal is to keep you informed on the hottest topics, the latest news and the biggest challenges you face as a storage professional today.

    Rich Castagna, Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchStorage.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchStorage.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

IBM lays off 150 workers at its Boulder facility

IBM and HDS swap programming code for storage servers

IBM, Hitachi strike up partnership

Comment on this article in the SearchStorage Discussion forums


Feedback on this story? Send your comments to Kevin Komiega, assistant news editor

Last month, IBM announced that it would team with Hitachi Ltd., to combine their respective hard disk drive operations into a new, standalone joint venture, the result of a budding storage relationship that can be traced back to July 2001, when IBM licensed the storage Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) for its Enterprise Storage Server, code-named Shark, to Hitachi Data Systems, a subsidiary of Hitachi Ltd. In return, IBM gained access to the APIs for Hitachi's Lightning 9900 Series storage server.

APIs are the programming code or instructions for how to access and share data between storage servers and devices.

"My feeling is that IBM and Hitachi are both looking to streamline their disk-drive and high-end storage businesses," said Mike Karp, senior analyst for Enterprise Management Associates, Boulder, Colo.

Karp predicted that IBM and Hitachi might take the relationship a step further and develop a generic, "vanilla-flavored" storage system, upon which each company could add its own software capabilities.

More evidence of IBM's cutting the fat from its operations came last week, when Big Blue announced a round of layoffs.

IBM handed pink slips to about 1,000 employees, 475 of which happened to be in the company's storage group in San Jose, Calif. The cuts also impacted workers at a number of locations including those in Rochester, Minn., and Endicott, N.Y.

IBM said, however, that the job cuts in its storage group were unrelated to its alliance with Hitachi.

"IBM did announce layoffs last week in several divisions, and yes, there was a small percentage of people in the storage systems group who were affected," said Glenn R. Hintze, manager of external communications for IBM's Storage Systems Group.

But, Hintze said, the IBM-Hitachi announcement had "no bearing whatsoever on these layoffs."

"This action was determined before the alliance was finalized in April," he said.

IBM called the layoffs a "skills rebalancing" to meet technical needs.

"Like any business, we constantly look at the products and services we offer to make sure we always have the right infrastructure and skills to support them at all times, so we stay competitive," said Hintze.

"IBM is absolutely committed to the storage business long term and this action will have no bearing on that commitment," he said.

More layoffs are expected and some analysts predict a total of 8,000 to 9,000 employees to be let go.

Related Topics: Storage vendors, VIEW ALL TAGS