Tape is not dead -- far from it. But Quantum Corp. believes putting a disk-based backup system in front of a tape library can make backup and restore operations faster and more reliable.
On Monday, Milpitas, Calif.-based Quantum unveiled the DX30, a new product for backup-intensive users aimed at reducing the time required for backup and the lag associated with restoring data.
There has been a hierarchy in storage since the mid -->
"For the first time the low cost standard components differ enough in price to make a significant difference between high-performance disk and tape," said John McArthur, group vice president for storage research for International Data Corp., Framingham, Mass.
But McArthur said one size does not fit all and users should look closely at their backup requirements before considering a disk-based backup system like the DX30.
The Quantum DX30 is a dense disk-based enhanced backup system that packs 3T Bytes of capacity in two rack units of space.
Quantum said because it emulates a tape library, the Quantum DX30 can be implemented quickly and managed with no changes required to the end-users infrastructure or backup policies.
"Disk to disk copy requires a complete change of the backup process," said Michael Brown, chairman and CEO of Quantum. "The DX30 emulates a tape library."
The Quantum DX30 product, as well as future products to be offered as part of the family, is based upon Quantum's unique Adaptive Disk Array Management Technology platform (ADAM). Quantum said ADAM enables high density and large data transfers without significant power consumption or additional management.
The DX30 can backup data at a rate of 140GB/hour. Quantum said these speeds are possible because the DX30 does not use an operating system, which makes it possible to backup large blocks of data.
"It's hard to push backup data through a file system," said Kevin Daly, senior vice president and chief technology officer for Quantum's Storage Solutions Group. "
The DX30 is currently in beta testing and will be available in the second half of 2002 for a cost of approximately $15 per G Byte.Let us know what you think about the story, e-mail Kevin Komiega, assistant news editor
FOR MORE INFORMATION:Comment on this article in the searchStorage Discussion forums Pitfalls and Approaches to Developing an Enterprise Backup and Recovery Infrastructure Tape is dead: Long live tape! Check out our Best Web Links category on Backup