Monolithic vs. midrange

Although the gap between midrange and monolithic arrays is narrowing, certain key differences remain.

With midrange arrays rapidly closing the gaps that exist between them and monolithic arrays, certain key differences...


  • Mainframe support. Midrange arrays usually don't support either mainframe ESCON or FICON connectivity, but this is changing because EMC and IBM offer FICON connectivity on their upper-end midrange arrays.

  • Skill sets. Administrators generally need to be more technically proficient to manage a monolithic array.

  • Replication services. Monolithic arrays support highly specialized replication features, such as consistency groups to ensure that a consistent point-in-time copy of application data exists before any further writes are written to the source data.

  • Availability and reliability. Monolithic arrays provide higher availability and reliability for the most demanding applications.

  • Known issues. Microcode bugs appear even in the best of arrays, especially those used in heterogeneous environments. Bugs in monolithic arrays tend to be better documented, easier to identify and corrected faster than those in midrange code. --JEROME M. WENDT
  • Dig Deeper on Disk arrays



    Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.



    Forgot Password?

    No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

    Your password has been sent to:



    • Flash technologies remain hot in 2016, experts predict

      Experts predict solid-state technology will remain hot in 2016, leading to the demise of high-speed hard disk drives, as ...

    • Tintri VMstore T5000

      Like all of its VM-aware storage systems, Tintri’s first all-flash array -- the Tintri VMstore T5000 -- allows admins to bypass ...

    • SolidFire SF9605

      The high-capacity SolidFire SF9605 uses SolidFire’s Element OS 8 (Oxygen) to deliver new enterprise features such as synchronous ...