Home > Storage Magazine > Columns > Hot Spots: Web 2.0 storage: Challenges and choices
EMAIL THIS LICENSING & REPRINTS
Storage Magazine

  CURRENT ISSUE  

  FEATURES  

  TOOLS, TRENDS & ANALYSIS  

  COLUMNS  

  ARCHIVES  

  SUBSCRIBE/RENEW  
 

Hot Spots: Web 2.0 storage: Challenges and choices
by Bob Laliberte
Issue: Nov 2007
printer-friendly
licensing & reprints
< PREV PAGE   |   1  |   2  |   3  |   4  |   NEXT PAGE  >

Do-it-yourself method (build or buy)
Google decided to build its own. Other companies, such as Facebook and MySpace, opted to buy products that supported their needs. Building out the infrastructure might make sense for Google because it has specialized expertise building massively scalable parallel storage systems and a culture that supports this type of approach. However, this isn't the preferred approach for most companies. Leveraging commodity disks and building out a proprietary file system takes years and lots of resources. If you believe your company has the talent, time, support and internal buy-in to take on this endeavor, you may want to consider this option. But ask yourself this question: Can you get your company's new service or product to market faster by building it yourself or with an off-the-shelf solution?

Again, the requirements for Web 2.0 models are very different from those associated with email or database applications. With Web 2.0, you're aiming to build a user population of hundreds of thousands (and potentially millions) of users. The data will be stored forever and will probably be filled with images, audio files and movies. If you choose to buy the infrastructure, where do you begin? Do you leverage your existing storage infrastructure that was really built for a different set of requirements or do you seek out next-generation storage systems built for these types of apps? These systems need to be massively scalable, provide predictable and reliable performance, and come at an affordable price point. With the potential to store billions of files and objects, they must also be easy to manage across multiple systems or geographies. In addition, they must interface with Web-based protocols and have replication capability.

Outsourcing
One of the more interesting developments in outsourcing is related to Web 2.0. Outsourcing companies are providing not only the infrastructure and host facilities, but the services to help accelerate Web 2.0 initiatives. Companies like Amazon's Simple Storage Service (S3) and Nirvanix provide APIs to help customers handle multi-tenancy applications, file sharing, and video or image transcoding. While these services are relatively new (S3 has been around for approximately one year and Nirvanix just launched this fall), they're generating significant interest; they're basically Web 2.0 vendors that are enabling their customers to offer Web 2.0 services by using their infrastructure and processes.

< PREV PAGE   |   1  |   2  |   3  |   4  |   NEXT PAGE  >





TechTarget Storage Media
Storage Magazine View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
Storage Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
SearchStorage.com
HomeNewsMagazineTopicsLearningWebcastsWhite PapersBlogsEventsAbout Us

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
TechTarget provides enterprise IT professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective IT purchase decisions and managing their organizations' IT projects - with its network of technology-specific Web sites, events and magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Reprints  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2000 - 2008, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts