Where NAS hasn't gained traction, at least not yet, "is for massive storage consolidation or to consolidate [block-level] enterprise application storage," says Foskett. Application consolidation remains the province of SANs. "A few companies I know are using NAS for database access, but they are just mounting it via NFS or Windows over CIFS [the Common Internet File System]," says Foskett. "It's a little like hammering a nail with a screwdriver. They do it because they can have many clients accessing the same data. They like the NAS interface, and performance isn't critical to them."
Except for the low end, NAS devices can consolidate many servers. "The filers can handle a lot if they are not swamped by client requests," Foskett explains. The limiting factor isn't the number of consolidated servers, but the volume of user traffic. Other storage managers report finding 10:1 file server consolidation is reasonable. With Citrix servers, the ratio is 6:1 due to greater client traffic. Dell Computer Corp. suggests a 5:1 to 8:1 consolidation ratio.
Altera Corp., a programmable chip manufacturer in San Jose, CA, consolidates storage for a mix of Windows and Unix servers at a ratio of 10:1, reports Rosemary Nahrvar, senior IS manager. "We got rid of a lot of old file and print servers and departmental servers and put it all on BlueArc NAS with 8TB," she says. The company recently purchased a second BlueArc device. "It is easy and much cheaper to add space--about $25,000 for 1TB using a BlueArc ATA array," she says. Altera also runs an EMC-based SAN for its Oracle database and ERP system.
Agere Systems Inc., an integrated circuit manufacturer based in Allentown, PA, embarked on its current NAS strategy in early 2003 with the goal of consolidating about 20 Unix file servers while providing 30TB to 40TB of storage capacity. It installed Network Appliance Inc. (NetApp) filers and used tools from Rainfinity to move data from its old filers to the new NAS boxes. Today, the company is reducing the number of NAS devices by replacing older NetApp filers with a larger model as the leases for the existing devices expire. "Over time, we end up with fewer--but bigger--filers, which lowers our maintenance and support costs and gives us a better cost per megabyte," says Alan Cohen, Agere IT architect.
At Houston Energy, an independent offshore oil and gas exploration company, the plan from the start was to consolidate nine storage devices in an EMC Celerra NAS device. The goal of the consolidation is stability, scalability, manageability and data protection. "We replaced nine old SCSI disk arrays controlled by Unix servers and some other old NAS products with a new 8.6TB Celerra system," says Paul Davis, MIS network administrator.
Microsoft makes an enterprise play
Although Windows has been traditionally relegated to the low end of NAS, Microsoft is making a determined effort to move Windows up the storage food chain with Windows Storage Server 2003 (see "Windows Storage Server 2003 and beyond: WinFS"). "In big enterprises, Windows was not the first choice for NAS consolidation, but with clustering that can change," says Mike Fisch, director of storage and networking at The Clipper Group, Wellesley, MA.
Windows NAS may be suitable for midsized enterprises, "but at the high end, enterprises will still go to SAN for consolidation," says Peter Pawlak, lead analyst, Directions on Microsoft, Kirkland, WA.
Consolidation of Windows file and print servers is a natural for Windows-based NAS. Among dedicated Windows shops--especially at the low end--Windows Storage Server 2003 should be warmly welcomed. "I haven't seen it yet, but I'm looking forward to Storage Server 2003," says Tim Killion, IT director at BRE Commercial, a San Diego real estate firm that runs Microsoft systems. The 125-person firm uses NAS devices from Dell, Iomega Corp. and Quantum Corp.
Dell insists that Windows Storage Server can scale sufficiently for serious enterprise storage consolidation. It will offer the Microsoft operating system with PowerVault systems that can handle up to 16TB with SCSI and up to 40TB with Fibre Channel (FC). "Yes, it can be entry level, but it also is robust and can scale to eight-way clustering," says John Pate, Dell product marketing manager.
EMC is also supporting Windows Storage Server 2003 for its small NetWin NAS products. "It's intended to be used in a core-edge deployment model, like you find with branch offices," says Chuck Hollis, EMC's vice president of storage platform marketing. It would require a board upgrade, however, to scale from NetWin NAS to EMC's Clariion line. NetWin works for organizations that want a low-cost, cookie-cutter storage solution they can quickly deploy at multiple satellite offices.
Adding advanced features to NAS
Vendors are loading advanced features into their NAS products. Windows Storage Server 2003 includes not only volume shadow copy for fast file restoration from snapshots but multipath I/O, iSCSI support, the ability to act as a gateway to the SAN, a new Web management interface and more. Many of these features plus others, such as a multioperating system and multiprotocol support, have long been available in the non-Windows world from NAS vendors.
The most popular features include high-availability clustering and point-in-time snapshots. Winphoria Networks, a division of GTSS Motorola, recently added a multiprotocol NAS storage array from Winchester Systems and makes regular use of NAS snapshots. "We use a snapshot for online backup of the file system," says David Heafey, IT manager at Winphoria. The snapshot is stored nightly on a second NAS device, where it maintains about one week of snapshots online. Heafey expects the multiprotocol NAS device to be instrumental in any future migration from NAS to SAN.
Agere uses snapshots to provide short-term recovery for users who need to quickly restore a lost or corrupted file. "We also will run SnapMirror with specific applications for redundancy and disaster recovery," says Agere's Cohen. SnapMirror is NetApp's replication tool. For full data backup, Agere also uses Veritas' NetBackup in conjunction with the network data management protocol (NDMP)--an open protocol used to control data backup and recovery communications between primary and secondary storage in a heterogeneous network environment--to send data to a media server with tape attached.
Houston Energy mixes FC disk and low-cost ATA disk in its Clariion storage array. Network administrator Davis then uses EMC's SureSnap, a snapshot capability that comes with the EMC management console, along with basic NFS file transfer to move data between high-performance FC disk, economy FC disk and low-cost ATA disk--all within the same array.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Next-generation NAS |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
What will the next generation of network-attached storage (NAS) look like?
ExaGrid Systems, Westborough, MA, thinks it knows and is calling it Grid-Protected Storage. An architected solution, Grid-Protected Storage promises to deliver distributed, shareable storage with data protection. It integrates policy-driven backup and restore, disaster recovery, on-site and off-site vaulting and compliance archiving directly into primary storage. The product, according to the company, should result in lower costs and less complex data storage.
Arun Taneja, senior analyst at the Taneja Group, Hopkinton, MA, describes Grid-Protected Storage as a "self-managing, self-healing NAS product that scales simultaneously in the dimensions of capacity and performance and offers built-in data protection." In short, it combines a NAS filer with nearline storage for backup and recovery, HSM for policy-based file migration, self-management, content-addressable storage and disaster recovery tools. But lest you think it does everything--the equivalent of a storage Swiss Army knife--it does nothing for SAN block-level storage and is unlikely to beat high-end products from NAS industry leaders in terms of high speed, Taneja says.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
NAS heads
Originally, NAS products were primarily appliances that combined hardware, the filer operating system and storage arrays in a single box. These devices can still be found at the low-end and the midrange markets. But increasingly, vendors allow the NAS operating system to be separated from the storage arrays to create a NAS head. NAS heads can be used as gateways to a consolidated SAN that provides both file- and block-level storage.
It seems like a good idea, but "today's NAS customers don't want all that. They want NAS because it is simple, easy and cheap," GlassHouse's Foskett says. Should storage become a centralized utility, the NAS head would offer a way to leverage block storage for files. But the storage utility isn't a reality today.
Still, NAS heads may yet gain traction. "It gives you a nice front end to both files and blocks on the back end. And as iSCSI takes hold, there will be less of a need to differentiate file and block storage," says Scott Robinson, CTO, DataLink Corp., a storage integrator based in Chanhassen, MN. When that day comes, the NAS head would open up interesting opportunities in terms of the use of primary and secondary storage tiers and information life cycle management (ILM).
Today most companies are not taking advantage of all the capabilities vendors are packing into their NAS products, although the best products in the market can almost match SAN technology in features and capability. To them, NAS remains easy and cheap file storage--period. And despite being widely deployed in the enterprise, NAS remains a stealth technology while SANs attract the most attention.