Will you favor standards-based storage?

Will You Favor Standards-based Storage?

This Content Component encountered an error
This article can also be found in the Premium Editorial Download: Storage magazine: Should you consolidate your direct-attached storage (DAS)?:

Will You Favor Standards-based Storage?

What are your hopes for SMI-S?
Will you require SMI-S support of your future storage purchases?
What part of the storage infrastructure is most in need of standards?

Many storage vendors are busy building in the Storage Networking Industry Association's Storage Management Interface Specification, (SMI-S, a.k.a. Bluefin) to their products. This month, we tried to gauge storage managers' interest in SMI-S, and the jury is still out. Overall, more storage managers had high hopes (rating of 4 or 5) for SMI-S than low hopes (rating of 1 or 2): 34% to 31%. At the same time, an overwhelming majority will not require SMI-S support of future storage purchases. Arrays and software emerged as infrastructure pieces most in need of standards. As one reader wistfully put it: "It would be nice not to have three different applications to manage my SANs from three different vendors!"
This was first published in June 2003

Dig deeper on Enterprise storage, planning and management



Enjoy the benefits of Pro+ membership, learn more and join.



Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to: