This article can also be found in the Premium Editorial Download "Storage magazine: Benefits of third-party data protection and recovery management tools."
Download it now to read this article plus other related content.
Some of the least-sexy storage tools just might be the most useful ones for coping with power problems.
History is littered with products and technologies that were "nice to have," but not "need to have." Because of all the fires we fight daily in our storage shops, we just don't have the time or energy to deal with "nice to haves"--we have too many "need to haves" on our plate. As Bob Brennan at Iron Mountain once told me, "You don't paint the house when it's on fire."
It's because of this phenomenon that technologies languish on the sidelines, even though it seems as if they'll provide obvious and immediate benefits. Storage resource management (SRM) is a classic example. What could possibly be bad about a tool that provides visibility and insight into the deep, dark recesses of your storage? SRM turns the lights on. Who wouldn't want to know that they have 87 copies of the same illicit pornography sitting on their Tier-1 storage? Would you buy new capacity if you knew you had tons of space you weren't even using?
Boring "vision" tools that provide insight and report on things like data types, asset utilization, mission success or failure, root-cause analysis, change management and so on, seem as necessary to me as ensuring that the system you run is getting power from the wall. But somehow these things haven't managed to make it onto the sex-appeal list. It seems the only time we decide to "turn on the
It's human nature why we do some of the stuff we do. It can be embarrassing letting everyone know your bulletproof security schema has a hole the size of Guatemala in it, or that you insisted on $300,000 for new capacity only to find out that 60% of your current capacity is consumed by photos of Britney Spears. I also know that if we put this technology in place it might jeopardize our "importance" within the organization, which is completely wrong. Being strategic and solving problems that prevent future problems is never considered anything but good by intelligent business folks.
This was first published in July 2007