This article can also be found in the Premium Editorial Download "Storage magazine: RAID turns 20: Do you still need it?."
Download it now to read this article plus other related content.
Anyone who doubts the power and impact of virtualization isn't seeing the whole picture.
I disagree to such a degree it makes me dizzy. IT infrastructure market forces have changed in nearly every way because of virtual machines (VMs). At VMworld, I was blown away by the momentum and possibilities. Few things are this important and the impact is just beginning to escalate.
Server virtualization is a new approach to implementing infrastructure that's far more efficient then ever before. One of the big flaws in the argument made by the industry expert I quote above is that it leaves out the significant increase in CPU processing power, which enables you to add more VMs instead of physical servers. For example, the virtual to physical ratio could be 20:1 today and 100:1 tomorrow. And VMs aren't just for consolidation; they're for better management of the infrastructure. The process of
| upgrading to new physical servers is a major advantage. Bringing servers online quickly for new apps is extremely valuable. The ability to perform bare-metal restores efficiently and cost effectively is critical.
So why am I talking about server virtualization in Storage Bin? It drives storage growth and the proliferation of storage networking. ESG recently researched the specific impact server virtualization has on storage networking. We surveyed 706 companies across different industries, countries and segment sizes. We found that 52% of respondents had implemented storage virtualization and 48% plan to within the next 24 months. That's 100%.
This was first published in November 2007