Feature

Rethinking backup licenses

Ezine

This article can also be found in the Premium Editorial Download "Storage magazine: Five ready-for-prime-time storage technologies."

Download it now to read this article plus other related content.

Users have long railed against the software licensing practices of large backup vendors. Much of their ire has been directed at Veritas (now Symantec) for its confusing, complex licensing practices (see http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/license),

Requires Free Membership to View

but other backup vendors' licensing plans also seem out of step with the way IT shops do business. Symantec has promised to unveil improvements to its licensing scheme in the first half of 2006, but some backup vendors are experimenting with new capacity-based license models.

Computer Associates (CA) began selling its BrightStor data protection and storage resource management suites with an optional Managed Capacity license last summer. Initially offered to sites with 10TB or more of data under management, the license is now available to sites with as little as 2TB, and is available through CA's channel partners.

Under the terms of the program, CA charges based on the amount of capacity under management—not by server, processor, agent, platform, number of slots in the library or any other metric. The amount of data in the environment is re-evaluated yearly, according to Eric Pitcher, VP of product management for BrightStor. "We don't charge you for what you used in the past, just what you'll use going forward," Pitcher promises.

Arkeia, another backup software provider well known in Linux circles for its Smart Backup and Network Backup, offers a pricing plan that charges based on the amount of data written. Arkeia Smart Backup is free for data sets up to 50GB in size, $99 for up to 100GB and another $99 for every 100GB thereafter.

According to Brian Babineau, an analyst at Enterprise Strategy Group, Milford, MA, the major backup vendors are exploring new, simpler licensing models, but it's extremely difficult for an entrenched player to change licensing policies without ruffling partners' feathers or decreasing revenue, he says. "You want to be easy to do business with, but not at the expense of the bottom line."

This was first published in December 2005

There are Comments. Add yours.

 
TIP: Want to include a code block in your comment? Use <pre> or <code> tags around the desired text. Ex: <code>insert code</code>

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
Sort by: OldestNewest

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to: