Feature

How disk has changed backup

Ezine

This article can also be found in the Premium Editorial Download "Storage magazine: Tools for successful data migrations."

Download it now to read this article plus other related content.

Disadvantages of disk-as-disk targets
Backup software companies are starting to charge for backing up to a disk-as-disk target, a trend that's expected to continue. Vendors defend this move because they're providing additional functions to their backup software. The going price to use a disk array as a staging device before data is moved to tape is approximately $2,000/TB. To use a 200TB disk array as a disk-as-disk target could add $400,000 to your backup software tab.

Requires Free Membership to View

D2D2T backup terms
  • DISK-TO-DISK-TO-TAPE (D2D2T) BACKUPS: D2D2T backups are first sent to disk and eventually copied or moved to tape.
  • DISK-AS-DISK: A disk-based backup target that behaves as disk and doesn't take on the characteristics of tape.
  • NAS DISK-AS-DISK: A disk-as-disk backup target accessed via NFS or CIFS.
  • SAN DISK-AS-DISK: A disk-as-disk backup target accessed via Fibre Channel or iSCSI.
  • FILESYSTEM-BASED BACKUPS: Backups that are sent to a disk-as-disk backup target rather than a virtual tape library or physical tape.
  • VIRTUAL TAPE LIBRARY (VTL): A disk array and server running an application that makes the disk array look like a tape library to the backup software application.
  • INTEGRATED VTL: A VTL that directly integrates with a tape component and also manages the process of copying data from VTL disk to physical tape.
  • STANDALONE VTL: A VTL that stands by itself, like a regular tape library. It uses the backup software's tape-to-tape copy to migrate data from virtual tape to physical tape.
A disadvantage of disk-as-disk backup devices is the nature of filesystems. Files are written, opened, changed and stored back to the same place. The new version of the file often doesn't fit in the same place where the old file was, so a portion of it gets written to the original location while another part is written somewhere else on the disk, resulting in fragmentation. The more files you add, delete and modify, the more fragmented the filesystem. The way a backup system uses the disk results in significant fragmentation over time, which degrades performance.

Another issue when using disk-as-disk backup targets is that some backup software products don't back up to filesystems as well as they back up to tapes. For example, backup software products know exactly what to do when a tape fills up, but they're not always sure what to do when a filesystem fills up. Many of the major backup products require users to point disk-as-disk backups to a single filesystem. When that filesystem fills up, all the backups fail--even if another filesystem has adequate capacity. There are also other limitations, like the inability of some backup products to scan in filesystem images. If you let a tape expire from your backup catalog, most backup products will let you scan the tape, find what's on it and then enter its contents in the backup catalog. Some products can't do that with filesystem-based images.

Storing backups offsite is another challenge with disk-as-disk backup targets. The normal procedure would be to copy the disk-based backups to a physical tape and then ship the tape offsite. The problem is that most people don't currently create copies of their tape-based backups; they'd have to start doing so if they started backing up to a disk-as-disk target. Therefore, you need to learn how to copy disk-based backup data to tape and then learn how to automate the process. These two steps can range from extremely easy to extremely difficult, depending on the backup product you use, and may also require the purchase of additional software from your backup vendor. Whatever method you choose to get the data from disk to tape, remember that the data is now moving twice, where before it moved only once. This means you'll need to budget time for the data to make that second move.

One final disadvantage of disk-as-disk targets is the lack of compression. While there's currently one NAS disk-as-disk target that uses data-reduction techniques on backups stored on that device (Data Domain Inc.'s DD200), most disk-as-disk targets don't have built-in compression. This means you may need twice as much disk with a disk-as-disk target as you would with a VTL that supports compression. (In-band, software-based compression products typically come with a rather hefty performance penalty--as much as 50%. In its DX100 VTL, Quantum Corp. claims to offer hardware-based compression that doesn't degrade performance.)

This was first published in November 2005

There are Comments. Add yours.

 
TIP: Want to include a code block in your comment? Use <pre> or <code> tags around the desired text. Ex: <code>insert code</code>

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
Sort by: OldestNewest

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to: