Get ready for virtualization


This article can also be found in the Premium Editorial Download "Storage magazine: Five ready-for-prime-time storage technologies."

Download it now to read this article plus other related content.

Combined-path architectures
Vendors that provide combined-path architectures offer virtualization software that operates in appliances, FC director blades or array-based configurations. Combined-path configurations handle the processing of I/O and storage service functions such as LUN masking and LUN discovery in the same logical configuration.

Requires Free Membership to View

Pros and cons of virtualization options
Click here for a comprehensive list of the pros and cons of virtualization options (PDF).
Virtualization appliances are built on commodity Intel servers running a Windows or Linux operating system with software that permits either a clustered or N+1 configuration. Appliances that support grid architectures allow organizations to harness the consistently increasing speed of cache, CPUs and FC host bus adapters (HBAs) to create a high-availability, low-cost virtualized storage environment.

A key differentiator among appliance configurations is whether they're implemented in a clustered or N+1 configuration. Clustered configurations such as IBM's SAN Volume Controller (SVC) operate as one logical entity that keeps the content of the cache of each node in the cluster in sync at all times, as opposed to an N+1 configuration that will be briefly out of sync when a management change occurs. The upside of the N+1 approach is that each node has no interdependencies with other nodes. If an error occurs in the core operating system or virtualization software of a node that causes a failure, that error won't replicate to other nodes in the N+1 configuration as would occur in a clustered configuration.

IBM's and FalconStor's virtualization software can operate on a blade that's inserted into an FC director. While delivering the same software management functions, there are some differences in how virtualization runs on an FC director than on an appliance:

  • IBM SVC and FalconStor IPStor software can only be implemented on a Cisco MDS 9000 or Maxxan MXV500 director switch.

  • FC director blades eliminate the need for another appliance and centralize the physical management of the devices.

  • The software on the FC director blade can interact with software on its appliance counterpart on other SANs, regardless of the FC directors present in those SANs, to enable advanced storage management functions such as asynchronous replication.
The third combined-path architecture is the array-based option found in two configurations. First, at the enterprise level, TagmaStore Universal Storage Platform (USP) is available from HDS, but it's also rebranded by HP as StorageWorks XP12000 and by Sun as StorEdge 9900. For the midrange market, HDS offers its NSC55 platform, while Sun offers its StorEdge 6920 array. All of these arrays extend their virtualization capabilities to virtualize other arrays. Of these products, Sun's StorEdge 6920 is at a competitive disadvantage. Being late to market, mostly unproven and introducing microcode that's new to most environments, users may find implementing and standardizing on StorEdge 6920 too great a leap to make because it introduces a new array as well as new software into their environments.

Conversely, HDS took its existing proven line of microcode from its 9900 series of arrays and carried it over to its new TagmaStore and NSC55 platforms. HDS also mimicked the approach of other vendors by presenting a Windows image to other vendor's storage arrays to discover and virtualize LUNs on those arrays. By doing that, HDS circumvents possible interoperability issues between its array and those of other vendors because most storage vendors certify that their systems operate with Windows.

Using the same microcode on both platforms allows users to have the same storage management console for volume management across the enterprise. It also supports most major multipathing drivers such as EMC's PowerPath, IBM's MultiPath IO and Symantec Corp.'s/Veritas' Dynamic Multi-Pathing (DMP) in addition to HDS' own Hitachi Dynamic Link Manager. The biggest advantage their approach offers over any other virtualization option is the minimal amount of change users will encounter when implementing HDS TagmaStore or NSC55, assuming they're not using the advanced functions on other vendors' storage arrays.

This was first published in December 2005

There are Comments. Add yours.

TIP: Want to include a code block in your comment? Use <pre> or <code> tags around the desired text. Ex: <code>insert code</code>

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
Sort by: OldestNewest

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to: