Storage Management Strategies for the CIO
This article can also be found in the Premium Editorial Download "Storage magazine: Hot tips for buying storage technology."
Download it now to read this article plus other related content.
 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The hierarchy of storage policies | |
|||
Requires Free Membership to View
|
|
|
|
|||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
||||||
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||
| ||||||
| ||||||
Although some policies are unique to an organization, there are often many commonalities between policies in different organizations. We find it helpful to divide policies into three categories: strategic, tactical and operational. (See "The hierarchy of storage policies")
Time to strategize
Strategic policies define the overall business imperatives. Think of the U.S. Constitution: Strategic policies are analogous to the Bill of Rights. There should be just a few, and all other policies should be assessed in light of them. Strategic policies are going to vary less from company to company. Here are some common examples:
- Standardization. Storage services shall conform to a defined set of offerings, except in extraordinary circumstances.
- Centralization. All storage shall be provisioned and managed by the centralized storage management group. No business may run its own storage infrastructure.
- Service level agreements (SLAs). Storage shall be provided to internal customers according to negotiated SLAs.
- Cost accounting. Business units shall be responsible for their portion of the cost of delivering storage services.
Strategic policies like these result in the alignment of the perspectives of the various parties at the negotiating table. IT managers often fear that if they offer solutions that are too costly, users might walk away and create their own infrastructure. We call this the CompUSA argument: "If I can buy a Pentium 4 PC at CompUSA with a terabyte of storage, why shouldn't I?" This is a red herring, but tends to be rehashed. Strategic policies let everyone focus on negotiating the right level of service from the perspective of the provider and the consumer.
Without alignment at the strategic level, efforts to create and enforce tactical and operational policies likely will fail. Without setting ground rules, tactical and operational policies can exacerbate any misalignment by forcing the IT organization and business units into a straightjacket of rules that are not in the best interest of either party.
Time for tactics
Tactical policies put the strategy into practice, governing the management of the storage infrastructure. They must be set within the framework of the strategic policies. Strategic policies are likely to look similar regardless of your business, but tactical policies will often look different. The following policies would support the goal of standard service levels:
- Data classification. Data will be classified into four tiers based on business value and risk.
- Data identification. Weekly reports will be developed to expose new or substantially modified data.
- Data protection. Data will be protected with a combination of tape backup, interarray mirroring and off-site replication, creating four levels of protection.
The key to success is to make tactical policies as specific as possible. We've spent hours in meetings listening to storage administrators and application owners discussing whether or not to use a certain tool. These discussions can be preempted if the specific tools have been determined and documented ahead of time.
This was first published in March 2004
Join the conversationComment
Share
Comments
Results
Contribute to the conversation