Home > Is there any reliability difference with unified storage?
FAQ:
EMAIL THIS

Is there any reliability difference with unified storage?

06 Feb 2007 | Randy Kerns

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   

There are some interesting aspects to reliability. First, are the [unified or multiprotocol storage] components any different? There are a few minor differences, but usually not a significant difference. In actual practice, "reliability" tends to be more colored by human actions than failure in hardware -- either through errors in administration or in the software written to run on those platforms. In this way, reliability is influenced by the complexity of the particular unified storage system. As a system becomes more complex, there are more opportunities for failures to occur. Consequently, a complex system will typically have a higher failure rate than a simple system. Added complexity also increases the possibility of operational/administrative errors; creating a reliability problem. Unfortunately, a lot of those "human errors" in administration are reported as a system or hardware failure. Ultimately, a unified storage system is generally no more or less reliable than a dedicated block or file storage platform of similar complexity.

Listen to the unified storage FAQ audiocast.

Go to the beginning of the Unified Storage FAQ Guide.



BROWSE BY TAG
Frequently asked questions,   Unified storage performance,   Unified Storage FAQ,   SAN (storage area network),   Multiprotocol or unified storage,   VIEW ALL TAGS

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   



RELATED CONTENT
Unified storage performance
Are there any differences in operations between unified storage and my existing storage systems?
What about the system features, like snapshot and remote replication?
What will be the impact on performance when mixing block and file in the same system?

Multiprotocol or unified storage
The University of Arizona consolidates networks with Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE)
Brocade expands battlefield with Cisco to encompass Data Center Ethernet and FCoE
Dell brands Brocade Fibre Channel, Ethernet, FCoE devices
EMC remakes 8 Gbps FC/10 GbE Clariion provisioning in VMware's image
IBM beefs up midrange storage arrays with 8 Gig FC, iSCSI, self-encrypting drives
Will 2011 be the year of Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE)?
NetApp goes native with Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) storage
FalconStor enters storage hardware market with its NSS HC Fibre Channel, iSCSI system
LSI dives into multiprotocol storage with ONStor acquisition
IBM sells Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) gear from Brocade, Cisco

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
unified storage  (SearchStorage.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary




Find Data Reduction
TechTarget Storage Media
Storage Magazine View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
Storage Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
SearchStorage.com
HomeNewsMagazineTopicsLearningMultimediaWhite PapersBlogsEventsAbout Us

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2000 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts