A somewhat surprising 43% of survey respondents report they have virtualized at least some of their storage to...
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
pool those resources. And the results are a stunning success: 89% gave a "Very satisfied" or "Satisfied" thumbs up, 36% said they're wasting a lot less capacity and 47% have realized some new efficiencies. Storage virtualization methods vary, with decisions typically based on what kind of gear is already installed. Our respondents indicated a nearly even split among array-based storage virtualization, appliance-based and software installed on a server.
Software-defined storage (SDS), a much discussed "new" storage technology, is a close relative to storage virtualization—so close that it would be easy to view SDS as storage virtualization 2.0. Forty-six percent of those surveyed said their company has deployed software-defined storage, with another even split among the three chief methods: server software that accesses a connected JBOD or other storage device (21%), software that pools servers' direct-attached storage (22%), and software or hardware that pools shared storage systems so they look like one big storage array (22%). And these users are serious about their software-defined storage, with an average of 249 TB in capacity. Scalability and low cost are two of the most cited benefits of SDS, although some users noted a lack of traditional features like data deduplication (42%), thin provisioning (33%) and replication (31%). The top two reasons for not having implemented SDS yet: 38% are happy the way their current systems are running and 16% aren't sure what software-defined storage means.
About the author:
Rich Castagna is editorial director of TechTarget's Storage Media Group.