Premium Content

Access "Virtualize disaster recovery"

Published: 17 Oct 2012

Virtualizing storage and servers can make disaster recovery easier, more flexible and less expensive. By Eric Siebert Designing and implementing a disaster recovery (DR) infrastructure is often complicated, expensive and challenging. Virtualization technologies -- for both storage and servers -- can help reduce the expense with unique approaches that differ from traditional DR methods and can provide increased flexibility and responsiveness. Server virtualization encapsulates an entire server into a single file, which makes transporting it to other locations much easier. Storage virtualization presents multiple storage devices as a single storage resource, which helps hide some of the back-end complexities of the storage devices and network. Either of these virtualization technologies will ease the implementation of a DR plan; used together, they can provide a very effective DR strategy. For most companies, the type of DR environment they devise is typically determined by balancing the amount of money they have to spend on one-time and ongoing costs, with ... Access >>>

Access TechTarget
Premium Content for Free.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

What's Inside

Features
    • Quality Awards V enterprise arrays: NetApp alone at the top

      In the last Quality Awards for enterprise arrays, NetApp and EMC finished in a dead-heat for first place. This time, NetApp ekes out a narrow victory over archrival EMC.

    • Virtualize disaster recovery

      Virtualization can save you money, time and effort, and make the often daunting task of designing and implementing a DR plan easier. But there are related challenges and costs.

    • Top new features of backup apps by W. Curtis Preston

      We look at some of the key backup technology advancements and describe how four leading backup vendors--CommVault, EMC, IBM and Symantec--have implemented these technologies.

    • Beginning of the end for hard drives?

      Enterprise-ready solid-state storage hasn't been around for long, but 33% of our respondents have solid state running. Price is still an issue, but disk's days may be numbered.

  • Columns
    • Could 2010 be a breakout year for scale-out NAS architecture? by Terri McClure

      Scale-out NAS is generally a more efficient option than traditional scale-up architectures. But technology change introduces risk, and companies may not be ready for a switch.

    • No more wasted tiers

      Tony Asaro explores intelligent tiered storage, which is becoming a necessity for many firms due to the massive amounts of data they're storing.

More Premium Content Accessible For Free

  • How to improve your virtual server storage setups
    Storage_cover_may_2013.png
    E-Zine

    One of the biggest challenges of building a virtual server infrastructure is fine-tuning the storage that supports the virtual machines. Having ...

  • Rethinking the way storage architectures are packaged and presented
    Storage_cover_april_2013_landscape.PNG
    E-Zine

    Cloud storage, virtualization and the growth of unstructured data have contributed to the way storage architectures are built and used. Virtual ...

  • Archiving stays active with LTFS and the cloud
    ArchivingStaysActiveWithLTFSAndTheCloud_040213.PNG
    E-Handbook

    While the concept of data archiving has existed for decades, archiving practices that were once considered standard are becoming inadequate. Factors ...