Access your Pro+ Content below.
The under-over on DR
This article is part of the Vol. 7 Num. 13 February 2009 issue of Storage magazine
One size doesn't fit all, especially when it comes to disaster recovery planning. Learn how to build a multitiered DR services capability. By Jim Damoulakis When Hurricane Ike struck last summer, many feared a repeat of the 2005 Katrina catastrophe. While Ike turned out to be one of the most destructive hurricanes on record, its impact was nowhere near as devastating as Katrina's. This was due, In part, to better preparedness across the board. From an IT perspective, Katrina raised the level of consciousness regarding disaster recovery (DR) and spurred more organizations to invest in "recoverability." However, building a DR capability, particularly in the current economic climate, can still be a tough sell. The business justification for DR is based primarily on risk avoidance -- a so-called soft metric -- rather than on hard cost savings. In addition, DR implementations often involve an investment in infrastructure that mostly sits idle waiting for that fateful day. As a result, organizations may be tempted to shelve DR ...
Features in this issue
One size doesn't fit all, especially when it comes to disaster recovery planning. Learn how to build a multitiered DR services capability.
Scores of excellent storage products were rolled out in the past year, introducing new technologies or adding significant enhancements to tried-and-true storage technologies.
The next generation of Ethernet is likely to have a profound effect on storage; pumped-up iSCSI performance may challenge Fibre Channel's tier 1 dominance.
Whether budgets are up or down, most storage managers are doing some belt tightening, ready to forego some features or performance in favor of lower price tags.
Columns in this issue
The compelling economic benefits of deploying scale-out NAS have the technology increasing its footprint in the general storage space.
Extreme circumstances call for extreme measures. We list four ways to trim or hold down storage costs this year.
Deduplication is great for paring backup data, so it should be even better for primary data. But where does it make the most sense to start dedupe?