Access your Pro+ Content below.
Remote-office backup not getting much easier
This article is part of the Vol. 8 Num. 9 January 2010 issue of Storage magazine
The last time we asked Storage magazine readers about backing up remote offices, 53% of respondents said they did it at each individual remote site. That might not be the best way to protect corporate data, but it's still the most popular, with 50% still not centralizing remote-office backup. To be fair, nearly two-thirds (63%) of those doing site-by-site backups have centralizing the process on their to-do lists. The other half -- those who back up to a central site -- use a variety of means, the most popular of which is pumping backup data through a WAN optimization device (30%). Data deduplication, which wasn't even a choice a couple of years ago, is now used by 27% of centralizers. But despite all of the recent technical developments in disk-based backup, a lot of remote sites are still backing up to tape; 55% of those surveyed said their remote offices back up directly to tape, while another 16% said their remote site backups go first to disk and then to tape. Only 7% said they use an online backup service for their remote ...
Features in this issue
With vSphere, VMware addresses many of the past storage-related shortcomings that created headaches for storage pros.
In their 3 Gbps incarnation, SAS drives have proved popular in low-end and nearline data storage systems, but at 6 Gbps, SAS-2 poses a serious threat to Fibre Channel interface drives and could change the landscape of high-end storage arrays.
Storage shops often struggle with anticipating new capacity requirements and ensuring that business needs can be met. After virtualizing its storage, Ford Motor Co. took a unique approach to allocation issues and made capacity planning as simple as balancing a checkbook.
Our monthly survey shows that backing up remote and branch offices is still a tough nut to crack for some companies. But newer tools -- like data dedupe -- are helping to ensure that remote data is protected.
NetApp, winner of all three previous Quality Awards for midrange NAS systems and one for enterprise NAS products, gets nudged aside as Hewlett-Packard and IBM prevail in our latest survey.
Columns in this issue
Storage vendors have become so enamored of the term "cloud storage" that it's hard to tell what it means anymore. But if you can get past the marketing hype, you'll find cloud storage has been adopted in some sectors as a data archive tier, and has been delivering cost-saving benefits for quite some time.
Despite the buzz about solid state and storage for VMware environments, 2009 wasn't a particularly banner year for standout storage technologies. Here's hoping the real storage innovations will come in 2010.