Pro+ Content/Storage magazine

Thank you for joining!
Access your Pro+ Content below.
Vol. 5 No. 3 May 2006

Disaster Recovery Extra: 10 hidden perils of DR planning

Your company may have formulated a disaster recovery plan and invested in the technology to support it, but that might not be enough to ensure that you can recover data. As the frequency of natural and man-made disasters has increased over the last few years, storage managers' disaster recovery (DR) plans are being scrutinized and undergoing much more testing and refinement. That's the good news. The bad news is that most of those plans will fail. What follows are the top 10 reasons why most DR plans will fall short of protecting a company's data. 1. There's no DR plan. If it weren't for CNN, most people would probably never think about disasters. Storage managers focus on day-to-day issues such as system performance and availability. Backups get more attention than DR in most companies because even a moderately sized company will experience the need for operational recoveries every once in a while. Few people have been through a disaster that takes out their entire data center or campus. The only way to solve the problem of not...

Access this Pro+ Content for Free!

By submitting you agree to recieve email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States you consent to having your personal data transferred and processed in the United States. Privacy Policy

Features in this issue

  • Quality Awards: Top NAS products

    In the latest Diogenes Labs-Storage Quality Awards survey, users chose enterprise and midrange NAS winners from more than 20 product lines. A NAS mainstay and a relative newcomer to the category took the top honors.

  • Keep end-user storage in check

    With free e-mail services offering up to 2GB of storage, it's tough to convince corporate e-mail users that mailbox limits are needed. But companies are realizing that user storage quotas are a necessary evil.

  • Windows NAS gets gussied up

  • Single-pane storage management

    Managing a heterogeneous storage environment means juggling a hodgepodge of vendor-specific tools. Some vendors are working toward a consolidated management console, but standards are needed for single-pane storage management to become a reality.

  • Vendor support falls short

    A recent survey from TheInfoPro shows that storage vendors' support of their products is still a sore point among users. The good news is that some vendors are finally paying attention.

  • New tape formats are bigger, faster & safer

    Tape capacities and data transfer rates are growing, but before you get hooked on the speeds and feeds, there are several key points worth considering.

Columns in this issue

  • Disaster Recovery Extra: Editorial

  • ILM isn't just tiered storage

    by  James Damoulakis

    Storage tiers are the first step toward true information lifecycle management. But they're only a small step—the key to ILM success is aligning your data with its business value.

  • Vendors need to create products specifically for SMBs

    Storage Bin: All too often, storage vendors treat small- to medium-sized businesses as second-class citizens. SMBs have the same needs as enterprises, so rather than giving them hand-me-downs, vendors need to create products specifically for this group. Vendors just might find that those products have the features that enterprises want, too.

  • Storage tears

    Storage tears

  • Data storage security trends

    by  Jon Oltsik

    2005 was a big year for storage security, with major vendors doing more than just paying lip service. Vendors are beginning to integrate security into new products or add encryption capabilities. But there's a lot more to do in 2006 to build a secure storage infrastructure.

SearchSolidStateStorage

SearchVirtualStorage

SearchCloudStorage

SearchDisasterRecovery

SearchDataBackup

-ADS BY GOOGLE

Close