Access "IOPS per what?"
This article is part of the Vol. 10 Num. 11 January 2012 issue of Hot, warm, cold: Pick the right disaster recovery site
Disk capacity has been the sexy specification the majority of us have latched onto, but it’s time to start thinking about performance and power consumption. Back when he was at Xiotech (now XIO), Rob Peglar used to present a PowerPoint deck that included a slide depicting a butcher processing a large pile of ground beef. The unappealing image provided a memorable hook for Peglar’s point: for years, we’ve bought storage in a similar fashion, using the simple metric of dollars per pound. Interviewing disk drive makers a few years ago, I learned a different but related truth about disk. Many disk drive industry insiders observed that their biggest sales accrued based on “larger,” rather than “faster” or “smarter.” Customers saw bigger capacity as the improvement that meant the most. A 1 TB drive was better than a nimbler 250 GB drive, and a 2 TB drive yielded more sales than a fancy 500 GB flash/hard disk hybrid unit. Bigger is better made a certain kind of sense, of course. Knowing virtually nothing about data itself -- the contents of a given file, its ... Access >>>
Premium Content for Free.
Hot, warm, cold: What’s the best DR site for your company?
by Paul Kirvan
Figuring out what kind of disaster recovery (DR) site your organization needs requires careful planning, and you will have to balance costs against any risks.
Oracle NAS comes up big -- twice
by Rich Castagna, Editorial Director
Quality Awards for NAS: With a lineage that goes back to Sun and StorageTek, Oracle’s network-attached storage (NAS) boxes are meeting, and maybe exceeding, expectations.
- Hot, warm, cold: What’s the best DR site for your company? by Paul Kirvan
Back up remote site data
by Jacob Gsoedl, Contributor
With plenty of viable options available, backing up remote offices and branch offices (ROBOs) shouldn’t be neglected any longer.
Users arm themselves for the battle with capacity management
by Rich Castagna
Survey respondents said their firms added an average of 59 TB of disk capacity to top off average installed storage at a hefty 413 TB. But do they know what’s being used?
- Back up remote site data by Jacob Gsoedl, Contributor
Predicting that storage predictions will be forgotten in 2012
by Rich Castagna
It seems like everyone is making predictions about data storage technologies for 2012 and beyond, but who are you going to believe -- them or me?
IOPS per what?
by Jon William Toigo
Disk capacity has been the sexy specification the majority of us have latched onto, but it’s time to start thinking about performance and power consumption.
Solid-state storage proving its worth among users
by Terri McClure
More than one-third of total respondents to a recent ESG survey said their organizations are leveraging solid-state storage in some form today.
Not all scale-out NAS systems are created equal
by Arun Taneja, Contributor
You may already be sold on the concept of scale-out NAS, but scale-out systems vary widely and you’ll have plenty of decisions to make before buying one.
- Predicting that storage predictions will be forgotten in 2012 by Rich Castagna
More Premium Content Accessible For Free
For the eleventh year, Storage magazine and SearchStorage editors offer their list of storage technologies likely to have an impact on data...
Scale-out network-attached storage (NAS) is the primary technology to handle big data needs in the media and entertainment (M&E) space. Using ...
Our Storage magazine/SearchStorage.com 2013 Salary Survey offers encouraging news: pay for storage pros rose again to an average of $98,082. ...