Access "Best storage for virtual servers: Pros and cons of FC, iSCSI and NAS"
This article is part of the Vol. 10 Num. 7 September 2011 issue of FC, iSCSI, NAS: How to choose storage for virtual servers
Virtual servers need a good shared data storage system. All major networked storage protocols work with virtual machines, but some are better than others in certain environments. Choosing a data storage system to use with virtualized servers is one of the most critical architecture choices you’ll have to make, and one of the most challenging. There are many options available, but there’s no single type of networked storage that’s hands down the best for virtual servers. Each environment is different and what works well for one may not work well for another. Fibre Channel (FC) has been the traditional choice for virtualization, but iSCSI and network-attached storage (NAS) have become increasingly popular alternatives that can provide good performance for more limited budgets. Let’s look at the characteristics of each networked storage type and review its pros and cons. Fibre Channel storage For performance and reliability it’s hard to beat FC storage, but the performance comes at a price in terms of both dollars and complexity. Because of its deep roots in ... Access >>>
Premium Content for Free.
High satisfaction among cloud backup users
by Rich Castagna
One-quarter of our Storage magazine survey respondents use cloud backup, and are pleased enough to keep a big chunk of their backup data stored in the cloud.
Cloud backup is ready for the enterprise
by Jacob Gsoedl
Cloud backup services have seen increased adoption by SMBs, but with a choice of methods and tighter controls, cloud backup is now also a viable enterprise alternative.
- High satisfaction among cloud backup users by Rich Castagna
Quality Awards VI: NetApp nudges Dell for top midrange array spot
by Rich Castagna
Dell plus Compellent proved to be a strong combination, but not quite strong enough to overtake NetApp on our sixth Quality Awards survey for midrange arrays.
Best storage for virtual servers: Pros and cons of FC, iSCSI and NAS
by Eric Siebert
Virtual servers need a good shared data storage system. All major networked storage protocols work with virtual machines, but some are better than others in certain environments.
- Quality Awards VI: NetApp nudges Dell for top midrange array spot by Rich Castagna
I/O: The next frontier
by Arun Taneja, Contributor
Processors get faster, networking tech takes it up a notch and bus designs keep up the pace, but they may all be dragged down if we can’t find a fix for slow I/O performance.
Curious about cloud? Consider these simple, safe ways to get started
by Terri McClure, Contributor
Cloud-enabled storage arrays are among the ways that cautious end users are testing the cloud without the worry.
The impact of virtual storage appliances
by Tony Asaro, Contributor
Software-only storage controllers running in virtual machines are an easy, economical way to get shared storage. But current products aren’t up to enterprise standards . . . yet.
Let’s get real about the cloud
by Rich Castagna
Cloud storage is really a pretty simple concept, so how the heck did it get so complicated?
- I/O: The next frontier by Arun Taneja, Contributor
More Premium Content Accessible For Free
One of the toughest things about supporting virtual servers was ensuring their data was protected. When traditional backup tools struggled with ...
In a relatively short time, solid-state storage has made an indelible mark on storage systems and data center environments. Today, few arrays ship...
Big data infrastructure and analytics are some of the hottest technology topics today, and it can sometimes seem impossible to dissect and digest all...