Access your Pro+ Content below.
This article is part of the Vol. 7 Num. 12 January 2009 issue of Storage magazine
There are two main approaches to archiving data: independent architectures for individual applications; or one architecture that consolidates all archives on a single platform. Data archiving is the vampire of the storage world. It promises to rejuvenate enterprise storage systems by sucking out debris so they can work as well as they did when they were young and not burdened by millions of files. But behind the benefits of archiving, there lurks a hidden detail: Getting archiving to work and the final cost of implementation can be terrifying. But times are changing, and the benefits of archiving are becoming even more enticing. Once focused solely on the data lifecycle (moving content from expensive disk storage to cheap tape), archiving has transformed into something altogether different. Due to compliance and legal reasons, today's archives are increasingly serving as long-term data storehouses, and many implementations forego the old stub-and-delete hierarchical storage management concept altogether. Archiving has become an ...
Access this PRO+ Content for Free!
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
Features in this issue
Hot site, warm site or cold site? Here's how to figure out the best disaster recovery strategy for your company.
Are you implementing green technologies?
There are two approaches to archiving: independent architectures for single apps or one architecture to consolidate all archives on a single platform. We examine the pros and cons.
Columns in this issue
RAID might not be the best choice for high-capacity drives. It's time to rethink your rebuild strategies.
Better start thinking about your data growth in deadly terms.