QUESTION POSED ON: 08 August 2004 One of our clients has an IBM SAN connected to an xSeries 345 with its own RAID 5 array. Their existing design consists of performing a disk-to-disk copy from the SAN to the xSeries server's RAID array. They are copying database dump files which are 4 GB on average. The files are then backed up by an LTO drive that is directly attached to the server. Of course, they are complaining about backup response issues. I have recommended that they connect the tape directly to the SAN and bypass the server directly, but they are hell-bent on keeping this setup. My question is, what can we do to optimize copying from a SAN to a regular RAID array? I have already recommended that they:
Change the RAID setup from RAID 5 to RAID 10 for write performance
Change the default cluster size being used on the RAID volume from the Windows default
Increase the cache memory on the RAID controller
Any other recommendations would be appreciated. Thank you.
>
Other than getting a new customer, you might try putting in a second RAID array with a new HBA to allow multiple data to be written to disk through multiple I/O paths. I wasn't clear whether the write-to-disk was the bottleneck or the write-to-tape. If the tape seems to be the bottleneck, get a second tape drive and HBA. The hardware costs are really inconsequential compared to lost time and the amount of administration you need. The other changes you recommend are reasonable but not big improvements.
Search and Browse the Expert Answer Center Search and browse more than 25,000 question and
answer pairs from more than 250 TechTarget industry experts.
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.
