Home > Ask the Storage Technology Experts > Backup: Business Continuity Questions & Answers > NAS vs. PC-based file server
Ask The Storage Expert: Questions & Answers
EMAIL THIS

NAS vs. PC-based file server

Randy Kerns EXPERT RESPONSE FROM: Randy Kerns

Pose a Question
Other Storage Categories
Meet all Storage Experts
Become an Expert for this site


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


>
QUESTION POSED ON: 24 January 2007
Can you please give some technical pointers for buying network attached storage (NAS) instead of a PC or server? What is the difference between NAS and a server?


BROWSE BY TAG
Backup: Business Continuity,   SAN (storage area network),   Fibre Channel (FC) SAN,   ISCSI SAN,   NAS management,   NAS (network attached storage),   VIEW ALL TAGS

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   



RELATED CONTENT
Backup: Business Continuity
Remote replication with Oracle software
Replication for disaster recovery
Status of NetBackup 6.0
Choosing the right storage solution
Data Guard based replication vs. SAN (EVA5000 & CA) based replication
Mirroring HP EVA4000 data
Ideal DR setup for NetBackup environment
NetWare replication options
Best practices for offsite storage
Oracle replication for failover

Fibre Channel (FC) SAN
How to get from Fibre Channel to Fibre Channel over Ethernet
Network architecture considerations for FCoE
Enterprise data storage requirements for FCoE
What you need to deploy FCoE: A storage checklist
Fibre Channel over Ethernet Special Report for enterprise data storage professionals
SAN sales boosted by need for storage efficiency
Factors to consider when implementing Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE)
The University of Arizona consolidates networks with Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE)
Dataram enters solid-state storage market with XcelaSAN
Brocade expands battlefield with Cisco to encompass Data Center Ethernet and FCoE

ISCSI SAN
Caltrol refreshes data storage infrastructure with Pillar Data Systems iSCSI SAN
Factors to consider when implementing Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE)
College finds early adoption of 10 Gigabit Ethernet iSCSI SAN a learning experience
Pivot3 and Seanodes increase performance, scalability of iSCSI storage products
Storage Decisions Chicago 2009 Session Downloads
Storage Decisions Session Downloads: Storage Systems & Storage Management Track (Chicago 2009)
Storage Decisions Session Downloads: Managing Storage Networks Track (Chicago 2009)
QLogic buys NetXen for 10 Gigabit Ethernet silicon
HP carves up blade storage with LeftHand software
iSCSI vs. Fibre Channel in virtual server environments
ISCSI SAN Research

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
enterprise storage  (SearchStorage.com)
Fast Guide to Storage Technologies  (WhatIs.com)
FCoE (Fibre Channel over Ethernet)  (SearchStorage.com)
Fibre Channel  (SearchStorage.com)
Fibre Channel over IP  (SearchStorage.com)
host bus adapter  (SearchStorage.com)
iFCP  (SearchStorage.com)
IP storage  (SearchStorage.com)
SAN island  (SearchStorage.com)
storage area network  (SearchStorage.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary


At a high level, a NAS can be described as a multiprotocol network storage appliance with an operating system optimized for file services. One of the advantages of a NAS over a traditional PC-based file server is that it can also act as a Fibre Channel or iSCSI storage array. This means it can present network share via CIFS or NFS like a PC but also give access to disk storage like disk array via iSCSI or FC. NAS appliances also come with data protection software features such as snapshots and replication.

If an organization already has a central storage array or a storage area network (SAN), it is possible to deploy a NAS gateway as an interface to some of the SAN disk and present it as CIFS or NFS shares. If you do not have or do not plan to implement a SAN but still need central storage capabilities, a NAS appliance is the way to go as it is more scalable than most PC-type file servers. If you only have a requirement to share a small amount of data on the network, a PC-type file server will likely be more cost effective.




Search and Browse the Expert Answer Center
Search and browse more than 25,000 question and answer pairs from more than 250 TechTarget industry experts.
Browse our Expert Advice



Search for Data Management Tools
TechTarget Storage Media
Storage Magazine View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
Storage Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
SearchStorage.com
HomeNewsMagazineTopicsLearningMultimediaWhite PapersBlogsEventsAbout Us

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2000 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts