Home > Ask the Storage Technology Experts > Storage Networking: SAN/NAS Questions & Answers > Networked storage vs. direct attached storage
Ask The Storage Expert: Questions & Answers
EMAIL THIS

Networked storage vs. direct attached storage

>
QUESTION:
I would like to know the business benefits in data storage management that are driving the adoption of SAN and NAS. Also, please suggest the factors that influence whether a business will derive benefit from as advanced storage architecture (scale, available support skills, upfront cost etc.)


BROWSE BY TAG
Storage Networking: SAN/NAS,   SAN (storage area network),   Fibre Channel (FC) SAN,   SAN management,   ISCSI SAN,   VIEW ALL TAGS

RELATED CONTENT
Storage Networking: SAN/NAS
Upgrading operating systems for two fabrics
Data centers and synchronous replication
Network File Sharing vs. Common Internet File System
Use of RAID with multiple drives
How to add more channels to a network
Achieving secure data storage for shared read/write I/O operation
SAN server accommodation
Offsite vs. onsite storage
SATA on a Dell Dimension 4400
FCID on two separate fabrics

Fibre Channel (FC) SAN
FalconStor, Violin combine on Flash SAN accelerator
Storage Roundup: IBM brings data deduplication to System z mainframe
Fibre Channel switch port shipments expected to spike after 2009 drop, then decline over long term
iSCSI SAN finally proves worthy alternative to Fibre Channel SAN for the mainstream
iSCSI SANs in a virtual server environment: Five best practices
iSCSI storage system implemented by University of Alaska Fairbanks
iSCSI storage: Rising profile in enterprise data centers
EMC: No plans to kill Clariion
Director switch comparison: Brocade DCX Backbone versus Cisco Systems MDS 9500
Fibre Channel SAN: Upgrading to 8 Gbps for storage networks a logical step as prices drop

SAN management
Compellent Storage Center 5 adds portable volume option for replication
Unilever maintains 5 PB Fibre Channel SAN storage performance with Virtual Instruments' NetWisdom
Storage Decisions Chicago 2009 Session Downloads
Storage Decisions Session Downloads: Managing Storage Networks Track (Chicago 2009)
Storage-area networks to become increasingly object based
Data storage management in virtual server environments
10 Gb Ethernet bodes well for iSCSI
Mellanox builds bridge to consolidation
Best storage Products of the Year 2008
Wide stripe before you dive into SSD
SAN management Research

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
enterprise storage  (SearchStorage.com)
Fast Guide to Storage Technologies  (WhatIs.com)
FCoE (Fibre Channel over Ethernet)  (SearchStorage.com)
Fibre Channel  (SearchStorage.com)
Fibre Channel over IP  (SearchStorage.com)
host bus adapter  (SearchStorage.com)
iFCP  (SearchStorage.com)
IP storage  (SearchStorage.com)
SAN island  (SearchStorage.com)
storage area network  (SearchStorage.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary


Greg Schulz EXPERT RESPONSE FROM: Greg Schulz

Pose a Question
Other Storage Categories
Meet all Storage Experts
Become an Expert for this site
ANSWERED January 2007:
I like the way you phrase the question, as normally I hear networked storage including SAN and NAS benefits and justification centered on business benefits tied to data and storage management. In other words, the usual rhetoric is that data and storage management can be improved by using SAN and/or NAS. Benefits to data storage management that are driving SAN and NAS adoption include enhanced connectivity, device sharing, data sharing with NAS, shared backup, potential for performance improvements and resiliency. Networked storage in general supports scaling of availability, performance and capacity compared to direct attached architectures.

There are the arguable added complexities of a networked storage environment using SAN or NAS compared to a DAS environment. The added complexities of a networked storage environment compared to DAS need to be evaluated on a scaling basis. For example, a couple of servers with SAS or SATA direct attached storage for a file server compared to several dozen servers accessing a Windows file or NAS server or compared to hundreds of servers accessing a shared iSCSI or Fibre Channel SAN.

Look at the number of servers you have, how much storage do you need and how much data needs to be shared. Also take a look at what your application and data availability and performance requirements are. Factor these among other attributes to decide if you need DAS or some form of networked storage.




Search and Browse the Expert Answer Center
Search and browse more than 25,000 question and answer pairs from more than 250 TechTarget industry experts.
Browse our Expert Advice



Search for Data Management Tools
TechTarget Storage Media
Storage Magazine View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
Storage Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
SearchStorage.com
HomeNewsMagazineTopicsLearningMultimediaWhite PapersBlogsEventsAbout Us

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2000 - 2010, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts