Home > Ask the Storage Technology Experts > Questions & Answers > Wavelength vs. dark fiber for SAN
Ask The Storage Expert: Questions & Answers
EMAIL THIS

Wavelength vs. dark fiber for SAN

Christopher Poelker EXPERT RESPONSE FROM: Christopher Poelker

Pose a Question
Other Storage Categories
Meet all Storage Experts
Become an Expert for this site


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


>
QUESTION POSED ON: 12 January 2006
Which do you consider the best option for connection of a SAN network: wavelength products from the local LEC or dark fiber? Please explain the pros and cons of each.


BROWSE BY TAG
SAN management,   SAN (storage area network),   Advanced storage area network,   Connectivity and protocols,   Advanced Data Storage,   VIEW ALL TAGS

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   



RELATED CONTENT
SAN management
Unilever maintains 5 PB Fibre Channel SAN storage performance with Virtual Instruments' NetWisdom
Storage Decisions Chicago 2009 Session Downloads
Storage Decisions Session Downloads: Managing Storage Networks Track (Chicago 2009)
Storage-area networks to become increasingly object based
Data storage management in virtual server environments
10 Gb Ethernet bodes well for iSCSI
Mellanox builds bridge to consolidation
Best storage Products of the Year 2008
Wide stripe before you dive into SSD
How your SAN will evolve
SAN management Research

Connectivity and protocols
Learn all about iSCSI and Fibre Channel SANs
Fibre Channel technology
ISCSI takes its rightful place beside Fibre Channel
Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop or switched disk?
Fiber optics over distance
How to minimize I/O latency
FC-AL port protocol for storage
The slow move toward faster Fibre

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary
Fast Guide to Storage Technologies  (WhatIs.com)
fat provisioning  (SearchStorage.com)
oversubscription  (SearchStorage.com)
RAID  (SearchStorage.com)
storage area management  (SearchStorage.com)
storage area network  (SearchStorage.com)
thin provisioning  (SearchStorage.com)
unified storage  (SearchStorage.com)
virtual provisioning  (SearchStorage.com)
zoned-bit recording  (SearchStorage.com)

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary


The answer is "it depends" on what you are trying to do.

The local cable plant (all the devices connected to a fabric at one site) should be using 50u (u = micron) multimode cabling (850 nanometer wavelength), which allows a distance of up to 300 meters using 2 gigabit (Gb) lasers (GBICS), and 500 meters using 1 Gb lasers. So, if all you are trying to do is connect servers to SAN switches and SAN switches to storage, then your best option is to use standard multimode SAN cables as described above.

Dark fiber is a term used to describe 9u single-mode cabling. Single-mode cables have a narrower core, which limits light defraction and absorption during transmission, which means greater distances can be traveled before db loss is an issue. Single-mode transmission also uses a 1300 nanometer (nm) wavelength source, which also allows for greater distance. Single-mode cables can be run up to 10 kilometers before repeaters are required. So, if you are trying to connect two SAN islands together over greater distances, than dark fiber (9u single-mode 1300 nm) is the better choice.

If there is currently no dark fiber owned by your company between buildings though, installing or leasing dark fiber can be VERY expensive. It can cost the same as leasing an OC-48 connection from a Telco. If you own the fiber though, you can connect up dense wave division multiplexor (DWDM) equipment at either end, and actually slice up your dark fiber into multiple wavelengths (usually 32 or more) that will allow for massive bi-directional bandwidth between sites.

If you don't need all that bandwidth and just want to connect two SAN networks together for, say, data replication between sites for disaster recovery, then using a standard leased IP connection could also work for you. All you would require is an FC to IP bridge at each location. The bridge can run either the FC-IP or iFCP protocol to tunnel your FC frames across the IP network to the other location. I would recommend a leased T3 or above for the IP network, although a T1 may do if the amount of data is low, and the bridge also does compression.




Search and Browse the Expert Answer Center
Search and browse more than 25,000 question and answer pairs from more than 250 TechTarget industry experts.
Browse our Expert Advice



Search for Data Management Tools
TechTarget Storage Media
Storage Magazine View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
Storage Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
SearchStorage.com
HomeNewsMagazineTopicsLearningMultimediaWhite PapersBlogsEventsAbout Us

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2000 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts