Home > Ask the Storage Technology Experts > Questions & Answers > Hot-hot replication with EMC's SRDF?
Ask The Storage Expert: Questions & Answers
EMAIL THIS

Hot-hot replication with EMC's SRDF?

Evan Marcus EXPERT RESPONSE FROM: Evan Marcus

Pose a Question
Other Storage Categories
Meet all Storage Experts
Become an Expert for this site


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


>
QUESTION POSED ON: 10 June 2005
Is hot-hot replication possible with EMC's SRDF? Is it a fair statement that the only way to be hot-hot is to have non-SRDF storage on both the production and disaster recovery sites?


BROWSE BY TAG
Advanced data storage backup and protection,   Remote backup,   Advanced Data Storage,   VIEW ALL TAGS

Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


RELATED CONTENT
Remote backup
Best Practices: Sorting out remote-office backup
Take full advantage of the remote replication process
Oracle replication for failover
Remote replication gets out of the array

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary


It's not really a shortcoming of SRDF that prevents it from doing hot-hot replication. Hot-hot replication is also called bi-directional replication, which means that you can update the data on one side of a replicated link, and the changes will be replicated on the other side.

It is nearly impossible to support bi-directional replication over any distance. If you have a copy of a file on both sides of the replication, and both are written to at the same time, which side's writes should be saved, and which side's should be overwritten?

Bi-directional replication can be performed in some replicated databases, where individual transactions can be controlled, but I would be very careful about implementing that feature. If I needed it, I would test it very carefully before using it in production.

Some organizations are content to have a dataset at site A that is replicated to site B, and then a second, independent dataset at site B that is replicated to site A. That arrangement is fine, since each dataset will only be written to by one side at a time.




Search and Browse the Expert Answer Center
Search and browse more than 25,000 question and answer pairs from more than 250 TechTarget industry experts.
Browse our Expert Advice



Search for Data Management Tools and Tiered Storage Reseller Solutions
TechTarget Storage Media
Storage Magazine View this month\\'s issue and subscribe today.
Storage Decisions Apply online for free conference admission.
SearchStorage.com
HomeNewsMagazineTopicsLearningMultimediaWhite PapersBlogsEventsAbout Us

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2000 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts