Which system is better for high availability, using a shared storage clustering architecture or using disk data...
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
replication over TCP/IP between two separate systems? Can you offer pros/cons? You have asked one of those rare questions that, in my opinion, has a clear-cut answer without any gray area.In my mind, there is absolutely no question that shared storage is a far superior method for building a cluster. Why? - Shared data is simpler. To keep two independent data stores consistent, you need replication. To keep one independent data store consistent, you don't need replication. - Shared data is cheaper. You don't need a fat-piped network between the systems for replication and you don't need to concern yourself with replication software and its associated expenses. - Shared data is more reliable. With asynchronous replication, it's always possible, even over short distances, that some of the replicated data will not have made it from the primary to the takeover system after an outage. - Shared data is faster. If you replicate with synchronous replication, even over short distances, there may be some degradation of performance on the primary system. Not always, of course, but sometimes. - Shared data is easier. If system A fails and system B takes over (depending on your method of replication and the nature of the outage), after A returns to service you'll need to send updates from B back to A before A is ready to come online. And, more significantly, if there is a power outage that affects both A and B while the data on the two systems are inconsistent, there is no way to know which system should come online as the primary. If the wrong one (A) comes on line data that had been written to B will be lost and it will be difficult, if not impossible, to reconcile it. Honestly, I have never seen a persuasive argument in favor of replication between two clusters. Hope this helps. Thanks for writing.
Evan L. Marcus
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in one of our .bphAaR2qhqA^0@/searchstorage>discussion forums.
Related Q&A from Evan Marcus
Storage expert Evan Marcus compares software and hardware RAID and outlines the benefits and drawbacks of each.continue reading
This expert answer explains the purpose of creating LUNs and details reasons for creating multiple LUNs.continue reading
This advice details the hardware and software requirements for setting up two data servers in fail-safe cluster mode for high availability.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.