Cloud-integrated storage (CIS) looks like any other block or file storage system, but with a twist. Data written...
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
to a cloud-integrated storage system is moved to cloud object storage based on policies such as the age of the data or time since last access. Data moved to the cloud leaves a stub locally and appears local to any application or user. The only difference is that it takes a little longer to access data in cloud object storage.
In this manner, the most frequently accessed and relevant data is kept locally, while inactive or passive data is stored on more economical cloud object storage. This effectively makes the cloud object storage an unlimited nearline tier for CIS. The cloud-integrated storage also deduplicates all data sent to the cloud object storage, reducing the monthly cost of storing inactive data. Frequent snapshots of the local data by the CIS provide an offsite layer of data protection.
While cloud-integrated storage sounds like a good value proposition, the technology never gained traction in the market for two reasons:
- Performance and functionality. Most cloud-integrated systems have a problem being the primary data storage system because the majority of them simply do not perform as well as SAN storage or NAS systems, nor do they often offer the same level of data service capabilities. This limited performance and service typically relegates cloud-integrated storage to secondary or nearline storage. Nearline storage is used primarily for backup and archive data or infrequently accessed data. Cloud-integrated storage is a separate platform, so data has to be moved from primary storage to the cloud-integrated nearline storage. This is where the CIS value proposition begins to wane.
Data migration is generally a manual, labor-intensive process. Backup and archiving work with cloud-integrated storage just like any SAN or NAS system. But the problem with CIS is that the majority of those same data migration applications also have the ability to migrate data directly to cloud object storage. The same is true for backup and archive applications.
CIS limitations to be aware of
Analyst: CIS best bet for local primary data
Object and cloud-integrated storage work together with RESTful APIs
Dig Deeper on Cloud object storage
Related Q&A from Marc Staimer
Object storage has unique features, including erasure coding and multi-copy mirroring, which may make it better suited to data protection than more ...continue reading
Why would you attach NAND flash storage directly to the memory channel? Isn't RAM much faster than NAND? Marc Staimer discusses this and more in this...continue reading
Marc Staimer takes a closer look in this Expert Answer at how 3D NAND flash vendors keep bit rot from taking place, a vexing challenge given 3D NAND ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.