I'd like to know why the Fibre Channel community has not standardized a multiple-link scheme yet. I can take two...
$10 NICs and use software to aggregate them together. Switch-based trunking has been around for years and even the IEEE has a standard for it (802.3ad). I think the storage industry is way behind the curve here.
Is there a simple answer as to why it hasn't happened yet? When Brocade pushed FSPF forward, I thought the floodgates were opening, but I've been sadly disappointed.
It's difficult for me to answer on behalf of a technical body (SNIA) or an industry to which I have limited exposure. However, what I can tell you is that this is a harder technical problem than it appears. Fibre Channel low-level protocols assume a lot more about the reliability of the link than TCP/IP. So there's no provision for out-of-order delivery (which is not normally an issue with storage I/O). Also, if the reason for trunking is to increase single-stream bandwidth, host-based striping on independent Fibre Channel paths accomplishes that.
Since there is limited value, and the problem can be solved another way, there probably isn't a lot of impetus being placed on solving the problem. That may change over time as other hard SAN problems are solved. But I suspect that this one is a little further down the priority list.
Hope this helps.
Editor's note: Do you agree with this expert's response? If you have more to share, post it in one of our .bphAaR2qhqA^0@/searchstorage>discussion forums.
Related Q&A from Evan Marcus
Storage expert Evan Marcus compares software and hardware RAID and outlines the benefits and drawbacks of each.continue reading
This expert answer explains the purpose of creating LUNs and details reasons for creating multiple LUNs.continue reading
This advice details the hardware and software requirements for setting up two data servers in fail-safe cluster mode for high availability.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.